Previous Page  51 / 253 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 51 / 253 Next Page
Page Background

39

Figure 2.20: Wealth-Learning Profile, PISA 2000 and 2012

Overall,

Figures 2.19 and 2.20

document widening wealth gaps in student achievement among

OIC countries participating in TIMSS. Similar gaps are also noticeable in PISA data though the

rich-poor gaps are narrower compared to TIMSS. But how large are these gaps relative to

participating OECD and non-OECD countries? This issue is addressed next in

Figure 2.21

.

Figure 2.21: Learning Levels of Children from Top and BottomWealth Groups in Urban OIC

vs. Rural OECD and Non-OECD, TIMSS 2011

Source: Author’s calculation based on WIDE database

Since OECD and some participating non-OECD countries are wealthier, comparison to the latter

is based on students from rural locations. On the other hand, data on OIC children are restricted

to those living in urban locations. Figure 2.21 plots TIMSS 2011 performance data for urban OIC

against rural children from OECD and non-OECD countries. A number of patterns are

noteworthy. First, the top-bottom wealth gap there is very large among urban children in OIC

countries even in basic mathematics competency. Over 40% children from the bottom wealth

quintile attain basic competency in math against more than 80% from top wealth quintile. There

is also a large gap in science though it’s slightly narrower compared to math. Second, wealth gap

is also present in non-OIC countries. However, the gap is much smaller in the OECD as well as

non-OECD countries. Considering the fact that the non-OIC sample corresponds to rural

population, this suggests that families in OIC countries suffer from the double burden of poor

0

.2

.4

.6

.8

1

2

3

4

5

1

2

3

4

5

Country Wealth Index Quintiles, 2000 Country Wealth Index Quintiles, 2012

Maths

Reading

Science

Graphs by category and year

0

.02

.04

.06

.08

.1

1

2

3

4

5

1

2

3

4

5

Country Wealth Index Quintiles, 2000 Country Wealth Index Quintiles, 2012

Maths

Reading

Science

% of children passing level-4 threshold

Graphs by category and year

0

0,1

0,2

0,3

0,4

0,5

0,6

0,7

0,8

0,9

1

math, level1

math, level3

science, level1 science, level3

OIC, urban q1

OIC, urban q5

OECD, rural q1

OECD, rural q5

NOECD, rural q1

NOECD, rural q5