Background Image
Previous Page  112 / 236 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 112 / 236 Next Page
Page Background

Preferential Trade Agreements and Trade Liberalization Efforts in the OIC Member States

With Special Emphasis on the TPS-OIC

90

The average MFN rates vary among OIC countries. The most recent comparable data on simple

average MFN tariff are available for 2012 (2011 in the case of some countries). In only four of

the OIC countries for which data is available does the simple average of MFN tariffs exceed

20% in 2012: Iran, Sudan, Djibouti and Maldives. Another 11 countries had average tariffs

between 12% and 20%. There is then a group of 18 OIC countries with simple average of MFN

tariffs in the narrow range between 9% and 12%. These can be called countries with

intermediate MFN tariff levels. Finally, a group of 14 countries had tariffs below 8%, with

Brunei Darussalam and Albania having the lowest tariffs. For comparison, the 2012 simple

average MFN tariff for all WTO member countries was 8.34%, the average for OECD countries

was 3.59% and the average for 31 least developed WTO member countries was 12.09%.

The analysis of trade weighted average tariffs that in most instances are available for 2011

does not change this general picture in any significant way. Differences between simple

average and trade weighted average are in most cases small, with the exception of Iran where

very high simple average MFN rate (26.6% in 2012) contrasts with trade weighted average of

below 15%.

The current level of MFN tariffs provides an indication of the upper bound of preference

margins that could be available to parties of any trade agreement implemented by the

individual OIC members. However, given that several OIC members are parties to multiple

agreements actual margins of preferences for any single agreement are likely to be lower than

those suggested by levels of MFN tariffs. Comparable and comprehensive data on effectively

applied tariffs are available for a smaller number of countries making a broader analysis

difficult. As an illustration during 2011-2012 particularly large differences between effectively

applied rates and simple average of the MFN tariff is observed for Morocco, Turkey, Sudan,

Comoros, and Uzbekistan. In the case of these countries effectively applied rates are between

3 and 8 percentage points lower than the MFN rates.

It is also interesting to see tariff trends over time. This provides an indication of liberalisation

effort. First, Figure 16 below clearly shows that on average OIC countries significantly

decreased their MFN tariffs from close to 20% during 1990s to 10-12% more recently. These

trends mirror global developments in tariff levels as depicted in Figure 17, although on

average OIC counties tend to have slightly higher MFN tariffs than the average for all WTO

members. In the last decade the difference between the two was around 2 percentage points.

The overall picture for the evolution of tariffs of OIC members as a group masks variation

between countries. The figure below provides a comparison of MFN tariffs between 2000 (or

the nearest year for which data is available) and 2012 (or the nearest year for which data is

available). During this period six countries cut their tariffs by 10 percentage points or more:

Iran, Morocco, Tunisia, Nigeria, Jordan and Djibouti. In seven other countries the reduction

of

average tariff was between 5 and 10 percentage points, and another 8 countries liberalised with

reductions between 1.4 and 4 percentage points.