Previous Page  116 / 228 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 116 / 228 Next Page
Page Background

Infrastructure Financing through Islamic

Finance in the Islamic Countries

100

additional tax exemption on profits paid from sukuk issued or guaranteed by the

government.

51

4.2.5.

Role of Islamic Finance in Infrastructure Finance

The role of Islamic finance in providing finance for the infrastructure sector can be viewed in

terms of financial institutions and markets and modes of financing in the form of equity or

debt. Three ways in which the Islamic financial sector can provide the funds for infrastructure

development can be identified. First is the taking of direct equity stakes in infrastructure-

related projects or entities. Second, the investing of sukuk issued by infrastructure related

projects or entities. Finally, the provision of direct financing to infrastructure related projects

or entities. The role of broad types of institutions involved in providing Shariah-compliant

financing for infrastructure projects and entities in Malaysia and the instruments used is

discussed next.

4.2.5.1. Government-Linked Companies (GLCs)

A key feature of the Malaysian economy related to infrastructure development and finance is

the role of government-linked companies (GLCs) in which the government has a controlling

stake. While some GLCs are directly controlled by government agencies, others are

subsidiaries and affiliates of GLCs. GLCs are funded by the government directly and through

seven government-linked investment companies (GLICs).

52

The GLCs constitute a significant

sector in the economy, accounting for around 5% of the workforce, 36% of the market

capitalization of Bursa Malaysia, and 54% of the Kula Lumpur Composite Index (Menon 2017).

While some GLCs are directly involved in the infrastructure sector, others provide funds in the

form of equity or debt and a few others provide a supporting role.

Some GLCs play an important role in the infrastructure sector with estimates of them

providing 93% of the utilities, 80% of transportation and warehousing, and more than 50% in

information communications (Menon 2017). Several infrastructure-linked GLCs have

shareholding by GLICs, thereby providing them with funds for infrastructure-related activities.

For example, Axiata Group Berhad, involved with mobile telecommunications with assets of

RM70.49 billion (in 2016), is owned by Permodalan Nasional Bhd (15.55%), Kumpulan Wang

Persaraan (2.67%) and Lembaga Tabung Haji (1.86%). Similarly, Telekom Malaysia Berhad,

dealing with fixed-line telecoms, had assets worth RM 25 billion and its shareholders include

Permodalan Nasional Bhd (20.43%) and Kumpulan Wang Persaraan (4.1%). Tenaga Nasional

Berhad is the dominant player in the electricity sector with assets worth RM 132.0 billion and

is owned by Permodalan Nasional Bhd (11.08%), Kumpulan Wang Persaraan (5.42%) and

Lembaga Tabung Haji (1.83%) (Menon 2017: 5-6).

A few GLCs were established specifically to support long-term investments in large

infrastructure projects. In 2011, the government established an Infrastructure Financing

Entity, DanaInfra Nasional Berhad, with a paid-up capital of RM10 million wholly owned by the

Ministry of Finance with the objective of separating the fund-raising function from the

51

http://www.mifc.com/index.php?ch=ch_kc_framework&pg=pg_kcfm_incentives&ac=209

52

The GLICs include the Employee Provident Fund (EPF), Khazanah Nasional Berhad, Kumpulan Wang Amanah Pencen

(KWAP), Lembaga Tabung Angkatan Tentera (LTAT), Lembaga Tabung Haji (LTH), Menteri Kewangan Diperbadankan

(MKD), and Permodalan Nasional Berhad (PNB).