Previous Page  22 / 108 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 22 / 108 Next Page
Page Background

15

2.4

What works and what does not: Critical success factors and main risks in

improving the access to health services

Discussion on what works to improve access to quality healthcare, and what does not, is probably one

of the most challenging issues in current agendas. With the advent of health system research, there has

been remarkable improvement in the study of health disparity and how innovation can drive positive

changes. However, decades of experience in improving access to healthcare can attest that there is no

‘simple recipe’ for ensuring equitable access to healthcare everywhere. A recently published book has

critically reviewed reform in 60 countries across the globe, covering all continents and regions. The

book presents 60 case studies on reforms in different countries, with a view on policy change involving

systems, economic, methodological, implementational and practice related interventions. The reforms

under study range from policy, care coverage and governance, to quality, standards, accreditation and

regulation, organization of care, safety, workforce and resources, technology and IT, and practical ways

for stakeholders’ collaborations and partnerships. Four common principles leading to success in those

60 countries (Braithwaite et al., 2017; Jeffrey et al., 2017) were identified:

1.

The ‘acorn-to-oak tree’ principle = a small-scale initiative can lead to system-wide reforms,

2.

The ‘data-to-information-to-intelligence’ principle = the role of IT and data are becoming more

critical for delivering efficient and appropriate care, but must be converted into useful

intelligence,

3.

The ‘many-hands’ principle = intensive interaction between stakeholders is key, and

4.

The ‘patient-as-the-pre-eminent-player’ principle = placing patients at the centre of reform

designs is critical for success).

These four principles are an excellent summary of the on-going wide range of efforts that are shaping

present-day health system innovations globally. For example, investing into small projects like pilots

or modest innovations have helped shaping the health system environment to achieve UHC in

countries like Iran

(Figure 8

shows trend of improvement for maternal deaths; WHO 2017b), New

Zealand, Estonia, Ecuador and Fiji. Information has a special role in ensuring access to healthcare by

all. By using technology for collection, analysis and dissemination to turn information into intelligence,

countries like Chile, UAE, South Africa

(Figure 8 s

hows trend of improvement for under five deaths;

WHO 2019), Ireland, China and Italy has made considerable improvement in providing high quality

and safe healthcare (

Ibid.

).

Figure 8: Proportion of maternal deaths among deaths of female reproductive age (PM %) in Islamic

Republic of Iran, (Left) and number of under-five death (in thousands) in South Africa, (Right)

Source: WHO 2017b and WHO 2019

7,5

4,1

2,2

1,6 1,6 1,5

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015

Proportion of maternal deaths among

deaths of female reproductive age (PM

%), Islamic Republic of Iran

92 94 95 94 92

85

79

71 68

59

55

51 48 47

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Number of under five death

(thousands), South Africa)