Previous Page  101 / 194 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 101 / 194 Next Page
Page Background

Reducing Postharvest Losses

In the OIC Member Countries

87

Postharvest

stages

continued

Causes of postharvest

loss

Actor who could reduce loss

(and grain origin)

Loss reduction

options

Farmer

produced

and

home-

stored

local

grain

Govt.

procured,

stored &

milled

local

grain

Govt.

procured

imported

grain

Private

trader

procured

imported

grain

Millers

Consumer

Marketing

Lack of access to transport

X

-

Farmer organisation

to

share

transport,

market info, increase

access to credit and

negotiation positions

-

Support development

of

quality

sensitive

markets, enforce grain

standards efficiently and

equitably

-

More

efficient

payment systems (e.g.

mobile money)

-

More efficient less

complex grain import

systems

-

As

private

sector

procurement

of

domestic

grain

increases,

warehouse

receipt systems may

have a role

Weak incentive for farmers

to produce and sell high

quality grain

X

X

Slow or unreliable payment

processes

X

Spillage and loss during re-

bagging

X

Uncertainty around changes

to import standards

X

X

Too many agencies involved

in grain import, uneven

enforcement of standards,

delays

X

X

Traders

purchase

grain

volumetrically (

ardab

) and

then sell it /kg

X

X

Storage

Poor storage hygiene and

cleaning

of

store

and

container

X

X

X

X

X

-

Awareness

of

and

training on improved

grain

storage

for

farmers, extensionists,

teachers,

traders/importers and

store managers

-

Awareness raising on

scale and value of PH

losses, importance of

clean dry grain at start

of storage

-

Thorough

cleaning

and

maintenance

of

stores

-

Effective protection of

grain to be stored >3

months (e.g. use of

hermetics,

recommended pesticide

application for farmers;

fumigation,

rodent

mgmt. & hygiene of large

stores)

-

Experiential learning

opps. for farmers and

extensionists on grain

storage options

-

Regular monitoring of

and attention to stored

produce

-

Build capacity of large-

scale store managers to

operate without political

interference

Poor inspection of grain at

purchase

X

X

X

Insect infestation

X

X

X

X

X

Attack by rodents

X

X

X

X

X

High

moisture

content

resulting in mould growth

and

increased

risk

of

aflatoxin contamination

X

X

X

X

X

Ineffective grain protection

X

X

X

X

X

Poor monitoring of stored

products and pest levels

X

X

X

X

X

Theft

X

X

X

X

X

Poor store construction/

maintenance lead to damp,

leaks, pests

X

X

X

X

Poor record keeping

X

X

X

X

Insufficiently trained staff

X

X

X

X

Corruption by staff

X

X

X

Political interference in stock

management

X

X

X

X

Milling

Poor hygiene at mill leading

to contamination

X

X

X

-

Increased attention to

mill hygiene, product

separation,

rodent

proofing

and

preventative

maintenance

-

Monitor

equipment

efficiency

Poor

maintenance

of

equipment leading to low

out-turn

X

X

X

Power

outages

affecting

operations

X

X

Political

interference

in

X

X