LIST OF FIGURES |
8 |
LIST OF BOXES |
9 |
LIST OF TABLES |
9 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
10 |
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY |
13 |
Scope and Justification of Study |
13 |
Conclusions from Evidence Generated |
13 |
Recommendations |
16 |
1. INTRODUCTION |
19 |
1.1 BACKGROUND OF STUDY ON MIS |
19 |
1.2 RESEARCH OBJECTIVES |
20 |
1.3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY |
21 |
1.4 STRUCTURE OF THE REST OF THE REPORT |
24 |
2. CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR REVIEW OF MIS |
25 |
2.1 INTRODUCTION |
25 |
2.2 DEFINITION AND EARLY EXAMPLES OF MIS |
25 |
2.2.1 DEFINITION OF MIS |
25 |
2.2.2 EARLY EXAMPLES OF MIS |
26 |
2.3 LIBERALISATION IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES: PRIME DRIVER OF DEVELOPMENT OF MIS |
26 |
2.3.1 LIBERALISATION AND AGRICULTURAL MARKETING SYSTEMS IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES |
27 |
2.3.2 LIBERALISATION AND SUPPLY OF AGRICULTURAL FINANCE IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES |
29 |
2.4 OBJECTIVES OF MIS |
30 |
2.5 GENERIC MIS PROCESS |
31 |
2.5.1 DATA COLLECTION |
31 |
2.5.2 DATA PROCESSING AND ANALYSIS |
33 |
2.5.3 INFORMATION PACKAGING AND DISSEMINATION |
33 |
2.5.4 MANAGING FEEDBACK AND OTHER ISSUES |
34 |
2.6 MIS TYPOLOGIES |
35 |
2.6.1 MIS TYPOLOGIES BASED ON HOST/SERVICE PROVIDERS |
35 |
2.6.2 FIRST GENERATION MIS IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES |
36 |
2.6.3 SECOND GENERATION MIS IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES |
38 |
2.7 BEYOND 2GMIS: FURTHER EVOLUTION OF MIS IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES |
40 |
2.8 CONCLUSION: EVIDENCE ON EVOLUTION OF MIS IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES |
41 |
3. OVERVIEW OF MIS IN NON-OIC COUNTRIES |
42 |
3.1 INTRODUCTION |
42 |
3.2 ZAMIS: TYPICAL EXAMPLE OF FIRST GENERATION MIS (1GMIS) MODEL |
42 |
3.3 PUBLIC 2GMIS MODELS: EXAMPLES FROM ETHIOPIA |
44 |
3.3.1 ETHIOPIA’S MIS FOR STAPLE CEREALS |
45 |
3.3.2 ETHIOPIA’S EXCHANGE-LINKED MIS FOR EXPORT CROPS |
46 |
3.4 QUASI-PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL/REGIONAL MIS MODELS |
48 |
3.4.1 INTERNATIONAL QUASI-PUBLIC 2GMIS MODEL: AMIS |
48 |
3.4.2 INTERNATIONAL QUASI-PUBLIC 2GMIS MODEL: RESIMAO |
51 |
3.5 2GMIS MODELS RUN BY PROFESSIONAL ORGANISATIONS/NGOS |
53 |
3.5.1 2GMIS MODEL RUN BY FARMERS’ ORGANISATION |
53 |
3.6 PRIVATE 2GMIS MODELS |
56 |
3.6.1 INDEPENDENT PRIVATE 2GMIS MODELS |
56 |
3.6.2 2GMIS MODELS LINKED TO COMMODITY EXCHANGES |
57 |
3.7 LESSONS FROM MIS MODELS IN NON-OIC COUNTRIES |
60 |
4. OVERVIEW OF MIS IN THE OIC MEMBER COUNTRIES |
61 |
4.1 INTRODUCTION |
61 |
4.2 OVERVIEW OF MIS IN ARAB GROUP MEMBER COUNTRIES OF OIC |
62 |
4.2.1 NATIONAL 2GMIS IN MOROCCO: ASAAR |
62 |
4.2.2 OTHER NATIONAL MIS IN ARAB GROUP |
64 |
4.2.3 MED-AMIN: AN EXAMPLE OF A REGIONAL MIS IN ARAB GROUP |
64 |
4.3 MIS IN ASIAN GROUP OIC MEMBER COUNTRIES |
67 |
4.3.1 MALAYSIA’S MIS FOR VEGETABLES |
67 |
4.3.2 MALAYSIA’S BURSA-LINKED MIS FOR OIL PALM PRODUCTS |
68 |
4.3.3 EXCHANGE-LINKED MIS IN TURKEY |
70 |
4.3.4 INNOVATIONS IN 2GMIS IN TURKEY |
71 |
4.4 MIS IN AFRICAN GROUP OF OIC MEMBER COUNTRIES |
72 |
4.4.1 BURKINA FASO: LEVERAGING SUB-REGIONAL 2GMIS FOR BENEFIT OF FARMERS |
73 |
4.4.2 REGIONAL-LEVEL INNOVATIONS IN 2GMIS IN WEST AFRICA: MANOBI |
74 |
4.5 RESULTS OF ONLINE SURVEY ON MIS |
76 |
4.6 CONCLUSIONS ON REVIEW OF MIS IN THE OIC COUNTRIES AND ONLINE SURVEY REPORT |
79 |
5. EGYPT CASE STUDY |
81 |
5.1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND |
81 |
5.2 MAPPING EXISTING MIS IN EGYPT |
84 |
5.3 PRIVATE MIS INITIATIVES IN EGYPT |
86 |
5.4 ASSESSMENT OF EXISTING MIS IN EGYPT |
87 |
6. INDONESIA CASE STUDY |
90 |
6.1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND |
90 |
6.2 MAPPING EXISTING MIS IN INDONESIA |
91 |
6.2.1 GOVERNMENT-RUN MIS IN INDONESIA |
91 |
6.2.1.1 Funding of Government MIS |
94 |
6.2.1.2 Role of The Ministry of Trade In MIS |
94 |
6.2.1.3 Role of the Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS or National Office of Statistics) |
94 |
6.2.1.4 Badan Urusan Logistik (BULOG) and MIS in Indonesia |
96 |
6.2.1.5 Utilisation of Market Information By WFP In Indonesia |
96 |
6.2.2 PRIVATE MIS: EVOLUTION BEYOND 2GMIS INTO E-COMMERCE IN INDONESIA |
99 |
6.3 PROMOTING WRS AND TRADING OF COMMODITY FUTURES IN INDONESIA |
100 |
6.4 ASSESSMENT OF EXISTING MIS IN INDONESIA |
100 |
7. UGANDA CASE STUDY |
102 |
7.1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND |
102 |
7.1.1 LIBERALISATION: NEW OPPORTUNITIES BUT ALSO CHALLENGES IN AGRICULTURAL MARKETS |
102 |
7.1.2 MIS PERCEIVED AS IMPORTANT IN IMPROVING AGRICULTURAL MARKETING IN UGANDA |
104 |
7.1.3 HISTORY OF MIS IN UGANDA |
104 |
7.2 MAPPING EXISTING MIS IN UGANDA: NATIONAL SYSTEMS |
106 |
7.2.1 FARMGAIN: NATIONAL PRIVATE PROVIDER |
106 |
7.2.2 AGRINET: NATIONAL PRIVATE PROVIDER |
108 |
7.2.3 INFOTRADE: NATIONAL PRIVATE PROVIDER |
109 |
7.2.4 UCDA MIS FOR COFFEE: NATIONAL GOVERNMENT PROVIDER |
112 |
7.3 MAPPING EXISTING MIS IN UGANDA: REGIONAL/INTERNATIONAL SYSTEMS |
112 |
7.3.1 RATIN: A REGIONAL MIS ACCESSIBLE IN UGANDA |
112 |
7.3.2 FEWSNET: AN INTERNATIONAL INFORMATION SYSTEM USED IN UGANDA |
113 |
7.4 FURTHER EVOLUTION OF 2GMIS IN UGANDA |
116 |
7.5 ASSESSMENT OF EXISTING MIS IN UGANDA |
117 |
8. CONCLUSIONS AND POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS |
121 |
8.1 MAPPING OF MIS: GLOBAL CASES AND IN OIC MEMBER COUNTRIES |
122 |
8.2 EVIDENCE AND LESSONS FROM CASES FROM OIC MEMBER COUNTRIES |
123 |
8.3 RECOMMENDATIONS TO IMPROVE MIS IN OIC MEMBER COUNTRIES |
125 |
8.4 RECOMMENDATIONS ON MIS MONITORING INDICATORS |
126 |
REFERENCES |
128 |
APPENDIX 1: LIST OF STAKEHOLDERS CONSULTED DURING COUNTRY VISITS |
136 |
APPENDIX 1A: LIST OF STAKEHOLDERS CONSULTED IN EGYPT |
136 |
APPENDIX 1B: STAKEHOLDERS CONSULTED IN INDONESIA |
137 |
APPENDIX 1C: STAKEHOLDERS CONSULTED IN UGANDA |
138 |
APPENDIX 2: ONLINE SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE |
139 |
APPENDIX 3: PROFILE OF ONLINE SURVEY RESPONDENTS |
142 |