Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  73 / 143 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 73 / 143 Next Page
Page Background

Improving Agricultural Market Performance:

Developing Agricultural Market Information Systems

61

Most of these countries have, therefore, piloted various market-supporting institutions

including different types of WRS and commodity exchanges (Onumah, 2013). The outcome of

the pilots has, however, been variable as progress has been rather slow partly because of

disabling policy actions resulting from government interventions to cushion producers and

consumers against price shocks (Coulter and Onumah 2002; Myers and Jayne, 2012). Food

security objectives are often prioritised relative to the goal of fostering output market

development. However, the case of the MIS in Burkina Faso, which is also linked to the

development of WRS, shows that these objectives do not necessarily have to be mutually

exclusive. That case is reviewed in this section.

4.4.1

BURKINA FASO: LEVERAGING SUB-REGIONAL 2GMIS FOR BENEFIT OF

FARMERS

Afrique verte is a sub-regional agricultural MIS which operates in three OIC member countries

in West Africa, namely: Burkina, Mali and Niger. It has been active in Burkina Faso since 1990

and disseminates price and other market information through mobile telephones and its

website. (David-Benz et al., 2012). In addition, it supports policy advocacy by producer

organisations with the aim of improving agricultural marketing systems in the participating

countries. Conféderation Paysanne du Faso (CPF), a national farmers’ organisation is part of the

Afrique Verte network. It was also an implementing partner in the EU-funded Farm Risk

Management (FARMAF) Project which supported actions to improve and scale up the use of MIS

andWRS specifically targeting SHFs. Prior to the launch of FARMAF all theWRS pilots in Burkina

Faso focused mainly on assuring food availability during the “hunger season” (Coulter 2012).

However, under FARMAF a commodity quality assurance system (QAS) was instituted which

allowed farmers to sell to major buyers such as WFP, SONGESS (a government-owned grain

trading company) and a large-scale private grain trader. Depositors were also linked to

microfinance institutions (MFIs) in order to access inventory finance (NRI, 2017).

Unlike the strategy adopted by MVIWATA in Tanzania and ZNFU in Zambia, which targeted MIS-

related investments under FARMAF in proprietary systems (see Section 3.5.1 in Chapter 3), CPF

opted to collaborate with Afrique Verte in disseminating information on prices for all major

agricultural commodities. The Afrique Verte also offers the following:

A platform through which various parties can post requests to buy or sell a range of

products; and

Information on stocks available for sale, including details of the geographic locations where

they are stored, especially when stored in specified warehouses.

CPF’s participationmade it possible to specifically link certified warehouses engaged in theWRS

pilot to the MIS. It also invested in a switch from the

‘Java application’

used by Afrique Verte,

which was noted to have hampered access by most smallholder farmers because it was not

available on most of the commonly-used mobile phones, to Android mobile telephones. In

addition, CPF organised a series of awareness events to enable farmers

“to master the use of the

new application on their mobile phones”

.

The results, as reported by NRI (2017), showed that farmers storing grains in the certified

warehouses under usually checked prices disseminated via the phones before making