Previous Page  187 / 228 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 187 / 228 Next Page
Page Background

Infrastructure Financing through Islamic

Finance in the Islamic Countries

171

sukuk. While Nigeria has no dedicated laws for Islamic finance, the Islamic financial sectors are

accommodated for under conventional finance laws. The Banks and Other Financial

Institutions Act (BOFIA) 1991, Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) Act 2007, Investment and

Securities Act (ISA) 2007, National Insurance Commission (NAICOM) Act 1997, and Insurance

Act 2003 empower the regulatory bodies to develop regulations for the Islamic finance

industry.

In Indonesia, Islamic Banking Act Number 21, 2008 governs Islamic banking, and

Sukuk

Act

Number 19, 2008 provides the legal foundations of issuing sukuk in the country. However,

there is separate takaful law and the sector is regulated under the Insurance Act Number 40

2014 which governs the insurance industry in the country. The banking law in Saudi Arabia

(Royal Decree No. M/5 dated 22/02/1386H / 11/06/1966) and The Capital Markets Law

(Royal Decree No. M/30 dated 2/6/1424H / 31/7/2003) does not explicitly refer to Islamic

finance. However, the Law on Supervision of Cooperative Insurance Companies (LSCIC 2003)

mentions that insurance service offerings should be in accordance with Islamic law.

Since infrastructure projects are complex and Islamic finance is relatively new, the contractual

framework for Shariah-compliant project financing may not be well-known. If each financial

institution involves lawyers and other stakeholders structuring these contracts, it increases

the costs of structuring and discourages Islamic financial institutions from investing in

infrastructure projects. In this regard, a standardized Shariah-compliant contract template for

project financing (similar to the standardized contracts issued by the UK government for

infrastructure projects) can be developed which can be used by different Islamic financial

institutions. These standardized contracts would reduce the costs of transactions and mitigate

the legal ambiguities of complex transactions.

Another issue that affects Islamic finance is tax laws. As Islamic financial products are based on

sale, leasing and partnership contracts which have tax implications, these products can turn

out to be more costly compared to their conventional counterparts. COMCEC (2016)

recommends changing or accommodating tax laws to level the playing field of Islamic banking

and conventional banks and also tax neutrality issues arising in sukuk issuances. In Malaysia,

the tax regime has not only been changed to level the playing field with conventional finance

but some tax incentives have been instituted to encourage the use of sukuk. For example,

issuers of sukuk can get tax deductions of the issuing costs incurred by SPVs and stamp duty

exemptions on instruments used to issue sukuk. Similarly, the tax laws have been changed in

the UK to level the playing field of Islamic finance with their conventional counterparts.