Previous Page  87 / 162 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 87 / 162 Next Page
Page Background

Single Window Systems

In the OIC Member States

77

where devoted to training users from these state agencies as well as from the business

community.

The Single Window strategy and business strategy as well as the organizational structure also

remained unchanged since 2009, but TULPAR received an additional mandate for export

promotion in 2014.

The limitation of the design became apparent when the Single Window was launched. AS-IS

processes where simply automated without a process simplification and re-engineering. A

second phase of development was therefore launched to undertake the re-engineering of

business processes and legal revision framework. This second phase will result in a matrix of

requirements for a new IT system, to be implemented in a third phase.

TULPAR relies on outsourcing of key activities. A third party developed the pilot project, the

design and development of the IT system was outsourced to a third party through a tender,

and the current second phase is also outsourced to a third party.

4.2.2

Single Window Scope and Scale

The Single Window was designed to act as a one-stop shop for trade transactions, namely

import and export licenses and authorizations. At the time of the Single Window development,

few administrations in the Kyrgyz Republic were using IT and the objective was to enable

electronic processing and the digitisation of documents for these agencies.

In line with its strategy, the SW provides functionalities and services for the processing of

authorizations, certifications and licenses prior to arrival or departure of goods – see the

conceptual diagram i

n Figure 25

below.

Figure 25: TULPAR Conceptual Diagram

Source: Authors’ own construction