Previous Page  45 / 253 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 45 / 253 Next Page
Page Background

33

Figure 2.13

shows aggregate trends in OIC countries that participated in PISA assessment. Two

OIC member states (Albania and Indonesia) joined PISA assessment in 2000 and three in 2003

round (Indonesia, Turkey and Tunisia) so that long-term analysis is possible. The HPEAs group

once again dominates others in all rounds of PISA assessment regardless of the test subject. In

contrast, the average for the OIC is below all other country groups during 2000-2015. However,

compared to performance in TIMSS, there is a rising tendency in the OIC average scores in

mathematics, science and reading in PISA assessment. Nonetheless, even by 2015, the average

score for the participating OIC countries is only slightly above 400 PISA points.

Overall, the evidence presented in

Figures 2.11-2.13

indicate that among participating

countries, OIC as a group is behind others such as the HPEAHPEAs, European and North

American countries regardless of subjects (e.g. mathematics, reading and science) and

assessments (e.g. TIMSS, PIRLS and PISA). Moreover, while the patterns in the case of TIMSS

suggest a worsening situation over time, there is an encouraging positive trend in the case of

PISA. Part of the variation in OIC average scores is owing to changing compositions of the sample

as more member states participated in the recent rounds of TIMSS and PISA. Therefore, the

analysis at the country level are repeated to better understand cases of positive and negative

deviations within the OIC.

Figure 2.14: Grade 4 TIMSS (Mathematics & Science) and PIRLS (Reading) Scores by Country,

1999-2015

Source: Author’s calculation based on WIDE data

BHR

BHR

IDN

JOR

KAZ

KAZ

KWT

KWT

MAR

MAR

OMN

OMN

QAT

QAT

SAU

SAU

TUR

TUR

ARE

ARE

300

400

500

600

Mean math score in TIMSS

1995

2000

2005

2010

2015

year

OIC

OECD

NON-OECD Maths score in TIMSS

BHR

BHR

IDN

KAZ

KAZ

KWT

KWT

MAR

MAR

OMN

OMN

QAT

QAT

SAU

SAU

TUR

TUR

ARE

ARE

200

300

400

500

600

Mean Science score in TIMSS

1995

2000

2005

2010

2015

year

OIC

OECD

NON-OECD Science score in TIMSS

IDN

MAR

OMN

QATSAU

ARE

AZE

IDN

300

400

500

600

Mean reading score in PIRLS

1995

2000

2005

2010

2015

year

OIC

OECD

NON-OECD Reading score in PIRLS