Previous Page  73 / 298 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 73 / 298 Next Page
Page Background

Risk Management in Transport PPP Projects

In the Islamic Countries

54

Table 15: Overview of elements of Phase 6) End of contract

Phase

Elements included

End of contract

Contract return:

What are the main cost and benefit of the different PPP solutions

with respect to the transfer/concession of the public asset implemented?

Follow up:

Which mechanisms enable to systematically follow up on risk

management practices and learn from experience? What are the main success

factors for better transport PPP implementations?

Source: Authors.

Contract return

The final phase of a PPP contract is about managing the transition of assets and of operations at

the end of the contract duration. This transition should be clearly addressed in the PPP contract,

by defining how the quality of the assets will be assessed at the end of the contract term, whether

on asset handover a payment will be made and how the amount of such payment shall be

determined (The World Bank et al., 2017). The APMG PPP Certification Guide (APMG, 2016)

suggests a period of at least three years prior to the expiry of the PPP contract for the

government to start to examine its options and for the contract management team to assess the

asset’s conditions.

The defining element of termination is the

handing over of project assets back to the public

sector

once the PPP contract term has reached its end. At this stage, the

transfer risk

arises, i.e.

the risk that the conditions of the project assets at the end of the contract term (when they are

transferred back to the government) are not in compliance with the PPP contract’s maintenance

and performance standards. This risk is borne by the private party. A thorough procedure to

verify compliance with the required asset hand-over standard specified in the contract is

necessary, and should be carried out prior to the expiry date. In fact, the private partner has an

incentive to reduce its maintenance effort in the later years of the contract. The procedure

should examine the assets and foresee measures of remediation.

The termination of the contractual relationship between the parties implies that also the

provision of the services comes to an end. Assets are divided among the parties and a settling is

carried out of all remaining obligations, together with a calculation of the compensation payable

on termination. At this point, however,

continuity

needs to be ensured. To allow the

government to provide the service, the private party guarantees some residual life of the asset

at the expiry date.

For the public sector to take over the service delivery, it is crucial that a proper assessment

process is put in place before the termination of the contractual relationship in order to verify

whether the necessary resources (e.g. in terms of financial and human resources) are available

or if additional measures (e.g. in terms of recruitment) need to be taken instead.

The PPP contract, in addition, sets out the conditions under which the contract may be

terminated earlier than initially planned, i.e. if the

early termination risk

materializes.

Contractual provisions on this point include specification on who may terminate and for what

reason, and what if any compensation payment will be due under the different circumstances.