Previous Page  72 / 298 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 72 / 298 Next Page
Page Background

Risk Management in Transport PPP Projects

In the Islamic Countries

53

The political framework may also contribute to renegotiations. As reported by Domingues and

Zlatkovic (2014), several empirical studies detected how the electoral cycle incentivizes the use

of PPP before elections to guarantee re-election. In these cases, renegotiation tends to occur in

the very first period after the elections have taken place, due to factors such as corruption, lack

of social acceptability of the project’s features, or the willingness to increase expenditure levels.

As mentioned,

opportunistic behavior

may also drive the private party to seek for

renegotiations. This can take place in case of a highly competitive tendering, by making loss-

making offers that could be adjusted in the future through renegotiation of the contract terms.

Vice versa, in a less competitive market such as the one of transport infrastructures, public

authorities can be tempted to alter priorities to accommodate private finance, at the cost of

reducing the overall validity of a PPP project or program (OECD, 2014). An effective political and

regulatory framework is crucial to avoid any amendment to the PPP contract during execution

of the project that is driven by opportunistic behavior.

A setting characterized by opportunistic behaviors and unilateral contract amendments or

arbitrary decisions by the procuring authority undermines the partnership rationale of PPPs, it

violates the legitimate expectations of the private partners, and puts future PPP projects in

jeopardy.

OECD (2014) reports specific measures on the regulatory framework carried out as a result of

lessons learned from experience in renegotiations. Among such measures, there are:

release of PPP contract conditions in detail on a public website;

establishment of a PPP delivery unit independent from the line Ministry to

control/regulate PPP contracts;

referral to a sectoral regulator for contract templates and review of PPP contracts;

disuse of clauses providing for adjustments to preserve 'financial equilibrium';

a freeze period for renegotiations for the first 3 years of the PPP.

In order to mitigate the risk of opportunistic behaviors, a concrete measure consists is the

appointment of an independent regulator capable of supervising contract design and overseeing

the renegotiation process. As regards the private party instead, the OECD suggests as a

mitigation measure a system of reputation tracking, in the form of contractor performance

benchmarking. An additional solution may be to design the procurement process in such a way

as to disincentivize over-aggressive bids and unsustainable offers, which contribute

considerably to the need for renegotiation.

3.2.6.

End of contract

The sixth and last phase of the conceptual framework, End of contract, is divided into two

elements, i.e. Contract return and Follow up. For both of them, the following Table sets out the

relevant questions that guided the analysis throughout the study.