Previous Page  127 / 214 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 127 / 214 Next Page
Page Background

Improving Transnational Transport Corridors

In the OIC Member Countries: Concepts and Cases

113

An attempt to put extra attention to the environmental issues is however shown in the CAREC

Railway Strategy 2017-2030. It motivates that the goal to strengthen the railway sector is to

promote a shift from road to rail, which eventually creates positive impacts on the nature,

landscape, and climate.

4.4.9.

Corridor Performance Monitoring

In order to measure and monitor the corridor performance, CAREC uses four Trade Facilitation

Indicators (TFIs):

1.

TFI1: Time taken to clear a BCP (in hours)

2.

TFI2: Cost incurred at border-crossing clearance (in USD)

3.

TFI3: Cost incurred to travel a corridor section (in USD per 500 km, per 20-ton cargo).

This cost is a sum of TFI2 and the non BCP cost (which refers to trucks operating cost

or rail tariff rates). 500 km is chosen as the length of a “corridor section”, as this is the

average of distances in the CPMM sample. The same applies to 20 ton as a “unit of

cargo”.

4.

TFI4: Speed to travel on CAREC corridors (in kph)

A report on Corridor Performance Measurement & Monitoring is published annually based on

almost 3,000 collected data samples of commercial shipments across Central Asia. This is of

great interest to both policy makers and the private sector operators as it answers questions

as: What are the causes of delays in the CAREC corridors? Where do delays occur and what can

be done to address those problems?

4.4.10.

Conclusion

CAREC corridor 3 can be considered as a successful corridor as it performs well among other

CAREC corridors. However, this corridor has not met the set objective to promote intra-trade

along the corridor. The intra trade on corridor 3 is only 8.5% of the trade with rest of the

world. The low trade level justifies the need to increase the efficiency of the corridor, which is

currently hindered by the following:

1.

The political tensions among the corridor countries, which are barriers for efficient

and smooth trade flows.

2.

Unharmonized transit trade procedures that cause delays at BCPs, which subsequently

causes substantial reduction in travel speed.

3.

With the exception of Kazakhstan, automation and ICT application is still very low.

The maturity of the CAREC Overall Institutional Framework plays a very important role in the

success CAREC corridor 3. The corridor management adapts two models: project coordination

and legislative models. The corridor management is imbedded in the legislative committees

that produce policies and legislation that support the corridor development.