Previous Page  122 / 214 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 122 / 214 Next Page
Page Background

Improving Transnational Transport Corridors

In the OIC Member Countries: Concepts and Cases

108

Table 26: Automated Customs Procedures in Corridor Countries

Country

Current state of customs procedures

Afghanistan

-

ASYCUDA++ system in operation for automation of customs processes

-

Transit procedures in line with international standards, enable transit

declarations to be submitted in an electronic format

-

Result: revenue enhancement as revenue leakages have been minimized,

and clearance times significantly reduced.

Kazakhstan

-

Electronic single window for Customs Registration and Control is in place,

although it is not fully implemented yet.

-

Strong use of ICT, automated customs information system has been

upgraded

Kyrgyz

Republic

-

Implementation of integrated single window system is ongoing, although it

is not fully implemented yet.

-

Unified automated information system is in place

Tajikistan

Still at an early stage (pilot phase test).

Uzbekistan

-

Single window is not yet in place, however an interagency working group

has been created

-

Unified automated information system for the state customs committee is

in place

Source: Fimotions (2017), from various sources.

4.4.5.

Social factors

Improving physical transport infrastructure is a driver for increased trade and foreign

investments, which ultimately results in poverty reduction. This is mainly of importance for

the landlocked CAREC countries. Poverty reduction is often mentioned as one of the expected

outcomes of CAREC infrastructure projects. Several projects have higher social goals like the

Qaisar-Bala Murghab Road project (see Appendix 4). This project is located in Afghanistan and

completed in 2016. The expected outcome is to promote not only the economic but also social

development and reduce poverty by rehabilitating the primary road network damaged during

two decades of conflict and neglect.

Table 27

shows the Human Development Index (HDI) of

countries on corridor 3.

Table 27: HDI countries on corridor 3 in 2015

Country

HDI

Rank

Afghanistan

0.479

169

Kazakhstan

0.794

56

Kyrgyz

Republic

0.664

120

Tajikistan

0.627

129

Uzbekistan

0.701

105

Source: Human Development Reports, UNDP.

As indicated b

y Table 27,

Kazakhstan has the highest standard of living among all countries on

corridor 3. Not surprising, Kazakhstan (together with Russian Federation, Ukraine, and other

countries) has become a receiving country hosting migrants from (in order from the highest to

the lowest number of migrants) Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, and Kyrgyz Republic. It is also due to

Kazakhstan’s open-door migration policy (local ID suffices to cross the border). Many people