Background Image
Previous Page  39 / 106 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 39 / 106 Next Page
Page Background

DRAFT

Improving the SMEs Access to Trade Finance

in the OIC Member States

35

While ECAs were originally created as institutions of post-war reconstruction in Europe,

mandated to support economic recovery through export, the scope of activities of export credit

entities has expanded significantly since then.

There is no single or definitive model related to the mandate, structure or focus of an export

credit agency. A spectrum of institution types, ranging from public sector to hybrid to fully

privatized, is wide, and the exact nature of mandates and areas of focus varies significantly.

While many ECAs are guided by the OECD Consensus

( www.oecd.org )

in terms of their

approach to the market the interpretations of ECAs and of their governments about scope and

nature of operations varies significantly.

The Export-Import Bank of the United States, for example, is directed by Congress to actively

avoid competing with private sector providers of finance or risk mitigation solutions. Not only

is US Exim expected to avoid such a competitive posture, but they are meant to exit a particular

realm of activity if it appears that there is interest from a private sector provider in becoming

active in a particular area.

Canada’s national ECA, Export Development Canada (EDC), by contrast, takes a very wide view

of its mandate, particularly since the last Parliamentary review of its mandate. EDC provides a

comprehensive set of financing and risk mitigation solutions, and is empowered to take equity

stakes in foreign companies if it can be shown that there is the potential for some level of

benefit to flow to Canada. The dynamic between EDC and the Canadian banks includes a

significant collaborative dimension, as well as a degree of competitiveness that some of the

banks have found historically objectionable, given the inherent advantage that a government

entity will have, over a financial institution.

In addition to the broad range of mandates for various ECAs, it is notable that the product and

solution set available through these various agencies is also at significant variance.

Some ECAs, including US Exim and UK Export Finance will periodically undertake competitive

analyses of the operating models and product offerings of agencies in other markets, as a

means of influencing national policy and potentially also impacting international practice in

the realm of export credits, which can sometimes generate significant dispute, if such credits

are seen to be unfair subsidies in support of export activity.