Previous Page  71 / 194 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 71 / 194 Next Page
Page Background

Reducing Postharvest Losses

In the OIC Member Countries

57

ONLINE SURVEY OF POSTHARVEST LOSSES IN THE OIC

3.

A questionnaire (survey monkey) was developed with spans questions relating to OIC Member

Country and commodity experience (7 food commodities including cereals, fish and seafood

products, fruits and vegetables, meat and meat products, milk and dairy products, and roots

and tubers), to questions about physical and economic losses in the value chains to how to

mitigate them. The questionnaire was sent to 400 experts globally who were selected from

contact lists and google searches. A total of 68 responded which was a good response for a

survey monkey questionnaire but not all completed the questionnaire in full. Data analysis

was conducted on the limited data collected. While the number of responses (59) is not

statistically valid for the crops and countries and there is no means to validating or verifying

the figures we have received, we identified the following: firstly new information about

physical and economic losses in the value chains has been gained. A qualitative understanding

of the causes of losses, mitigation of these losses, and constraints has been developed for each

of the groups of commodities. However, here are large gaps in knowledge for many countries

and products where no responses have been received.

We have excluded the reported economic losses which were requested as a percentage. The

reason is that the majority of the respondents reported economic losses that mirrored the

physical losses. However, we know from other work (Naziri et al., 2014) that economic losses

are often different from physical losses; for example a 10% physical loss of a product at the

consumer end of the value chain results in a much higher economic loss than an equivalent

loss at the farm end of the value chain where the product has a much lower value.

3.1.

Introduction

The survey was sent to nearly 400 experts who we perceived would have experience of

postharvest issues in the OIC countries. The methodology is given in the introduction.

3.2.

Results

The analysis is as follows and is by responses to asked in the questionnaire

Countries respondents had experience with postharvest value chain activities

Figure

indicates that the majority of respondents had experience of postharvest work in the

following top ten countries being Uganda, Nigeria, Benin, Mozambique, Bangladesh, Indonesia,

Senegal, Togo, Burkina Faso and Egypt. There were 22 countries where no experience was

reported and this suggests a potential gap is general expertise.