Previous Page  67 / 194 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 67 / 194 Next Page
Page Background

Reducing Postharvest Losses

In the OIC Member Countries

53

Fish chain

stage

Cause of Losses

Main type

of losses

Geographical

areas

Losses reduction strategy

Transport

and

distribution

Delays in packing, loading,

transport causing spoilage;

Careless handling resulting in

physical

damage

and

fragmentation of smoked fish;

Poor

road

and

transport

logistics;

Inappropriate vehicles

Remoteness of fishing villages

Physical,

Quality

Developing

countries,

especially in

Sub-Saharan

Africa

Use of ice/insulated boxed for fresh

fish;

Appropriate packaging such as rigid

containers;

Proper packing before transport

Storage

Absence of or poor storage

facilities/cold rooms leading to

spoilage;

Insect infestation;

Mould growth

Physical,

Quality,

Nutritional

Developing

countries,

especially in

Sub-Saharan

Africa.

Properly designed stores

Good hygienic practice

Pest prevention

Store management and product

rotation (first in first out)

Marketing

Oversupply of fish

Lack of buyers

Insect infestation

Under-utilization

of

some

species for fish meal;

Mismanagement of fish products

imports.

Quality,

Economic

Worldwide

Developing

countries,

especially in

Sub-Saharan

Africa (insect

infestation).

Proper market infrastructure and

management

Implementation

of

food safety

legislation

Use of ice/insulated boxes or other

preservation techniques;

Exploiting the economic potential of

sustainable by-catch;

Promotion of value added products

from low value fish species;

Raising public awareness on fish

quality and food waste;

Access to market information;

Access to more rewarding markets;

Local and better data collection for

just-in-time production and marketing.

Fisheries in the OIC Countries

The study covers 57 countries ranging from Guyana in the west to Indonesia in the east. As a

first step, the relative importance of the fisheries sector in each country was assessed. This

was based on the following:

a)

Gross volume of fish landed

b)

Economic importance: This was assessed on the fish produced per head of population.

c)

Importance to food security: This was assessed on the basis of fish consumption per head

of population per year.

Using the above, the importance of fisheries was ranked as follows:

a)

Very important: The country is a leading producer or the sector is a major contributor to

livelihoods

b)

Important: The sector plays a significant role in the country’s economy or livelihoods.

c)

Neither important nor unimportant: the sector exists but is not leading economic or social

driver.

d)

Fairly unimportant: Fisheries and aquaculture is comparatively marginal in the national

economy

e)

Completely unimportant: The fisheries sector is virtually non-existent.

The purpose is to undertake a rapid segmentation to focus further study. This is shown

graphically i

n Figure,

below.