Previous Page  40 / 213 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 40 / 213 Next Page
Page Background

COMCEC

Reducing Food Waste

In the 01CMember Countries

Table 11: Classification of food service food waste drivers by context categories

Context categories

Causes

Technological

• Sterage

• Equipment and centainers

• Lack ef geed practice

Institutional

Business and economy

• Difficulty te estimate and calculate the right

ameunt ef feed te ceek (related te censumer

preference fer wide assertment ef preducts]

• Censumer expectatiens predictien and demand

ferecasting

• Inflexibility in pertiening

• Situatienal reasens 'feed being served but net

eaten’

• Operatienal reasens 'feed being prepared, but net

served’

Legislation and

policies

• Ban en feeding ABP and catering waste te animals

• Expiry dates (insufficient infermatien in labelling]

Social

(consumer behaviors and lifestyles)

• Behavier/attitude

• Censumer preference

Source: FUSIONS 2014

2.3. E n v ir o n m e n t a l im p a c t

heed waste has very significant impacts en the environment as it is accompanied by a waste ef

resources (e.g. land, water and energy] and pellutien (peer use ef fertilizers and pesticides,

methane preductien in landfill] asseciated with the preductien ef feed. This waste results in the

needless use ef reseurces used te preduce the feed wasted.

In 2013, the hAO published the ‘heed wastage feetprint' (hAO, 2013] repert, which prevides a

glebal acceunt ef the environmental feetprint asseciated with feed waste. The study fecused en

climate, water, land and biediversity impacts, and estimated the carben feetprint ef feed

preduced and net eaten as 3.3 giga tennes ef CO

2

equivalent. If a ceuntry, glebal feed wastage

weuld rank as the third highest emitter after the US and China (hAO). In the UK, CO

2

emissiens

asseciated with feed waste is appreximately a fifth ef tetal UK emissiens (DECC, 2010].

The highest carben feetprint ef feed waste eccurs at the censumptien phase (37% ef the tetal],

whereas censumptien enly acceunts fer 22% ef tetal velume. This is due te the energy used fer

ceeking, but alse includes energy used fer grewing, stering, processing, distributing and

dispesing feed. On average censumer waste is equivalent te eight times mere energy ‘waste’

than pest-harvest waste (Debbs et al., 2011].

WRAP estimates that 78% ef the heuseheld feed waste CO

2

feetprint is aveidable and 22%

pessibly aveidable. The average carben feetprint ef aveidable heuseheld feed waste is 330kg

CO

2

per persen per year, which is equivalent te appreximately ene third ef emissiens asseciated

with heuseheld electricity use per persen in the UK (WRAP, 2011] (see higure 12].

31