Previous Page  120 / 152 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 120 / 152 Next Page
Page Background

Analysis of Agri-Food Trade Structures

To Promote Agri-Food Trade Networks

In the Islamic Countries

103

The growth rates of exports and imports of the agricultural products are also interesting to

comment: they are quite variable (due to natural conditions) and oscillate between positive

values (with a maximum of 51% for exports in 2015) and negative values (with a peak of -33%

for imports in 2009).

Table 25

:

Trend and Performance of Agricultural Trade

vis-a-vis

Total Trade, 2005-2016, Billion USD

Year

Export performance

Import Performance

All products

Agricultural products

All products

Agricultural products

Total export

value

Export

value

Share in

total export

Growth, % Total import

value

Import

value

Share in total

import

Growth,

%

2005

10

1

11

---

13

1

10

---

2006

12

1

12

27

15

1

10

8

2007

15

1

10

4

19

2

11

48

2008

19

2

9

19

25

3

11

31

2009

14

1

10

-22

19

2

10

-33

2010

16

1

8

-5

22

2

11

27

2011

18

2

10

40

24

3

13

27

2012

17

2

10

-12

25

3

10

-17

2013

17

2

10

4

24

3

12

13

2014

17

1

8

-20

25

3

11

-5

2015

14

2

15

52

20

3

12

-8

2016

14

1

11

-29

20

2

12

-4

Source: UN Comtrade.

Figure 44 r

eports statistics on the share of OIC member countries in trade flows of Tunisia in

agri-food products. It is clear that trade with non-OIC countries is significantly higher than trade

with countries from the region. It seems that Tunisia has more facility to exchange agricultural

products with non-OIC countries. It is interesting to note, also, that trade balance with OIC

member countries is positive for all the period while a structural deficit can be noticed for flows

with non-OIC countries