Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  112 / 213 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 112 / 213 Next Page
Page Background

Improving Agricultural Market Performance

:

Creation and Development of Market Institutions

98

5.2 Tunisia

The purpose of this country case study is to firstly introduce Tunisia’s general agricultural

market system (5.2.1), after which a selection of institutions will be evaluated into more

details (5.2.2 to 5.2.4). Conclusions and lessons learnt may be generalized and serve as

inspiration to other OIC Member Countries (5.2.5).

5.2.1 Overview of Agricultural & Food Sectors and Markets

The following section briefly describes the current situation of the five stages of Tunisia’s

agricultural market system as explained in the Conceptual Framework. The selected

agricultural market institutions (Section 5.2.2) typically intervene in one or more of these

stages. The five stages include:

Production;

Handling and storage;

Processing and packaging;

Distribution and market; and

Consumption and trade.

Production

Historically, Tunisia’s agricultural production structure has been marked by a two-tier

structure of a few large agro-industrial companies complemented by small-scale subsistence

family producers.

151

As of this moment, about 85% to 89% of Tunisia’s 570,000 farmers own

less than 20 hectares, indicating most agricultural producers are still considered small-scale

farmers.

152

The average agricultural productivity per hectare equals US$1,246, which is

slightly below the OIC average of US$1,312 in 2013.

153

In fact, the definition of the “farmer” status is not clearly defined and no state authority exists

to authorize farmers and grant them an official document (e.g. “farmer card”). Many non-

farmers now profit from state support and tax benefits initially intended for small-scale

farmers. This lack of official authorization prevents farmers from proving land ownership,

which, in turn, limited their abilities to obtain financial support such as loans and insurances.

This leads to a virtuous circle, given the fact many small-scale farmers already face over-

indebtedness. Farmers have consequently looked for other jobs or combining other jobs with

their farming activities, reducing the overall productivity of Tunisia’s agricultural sector.

Tunisia’s agricultural products, however, have great potential as they are characterized by a

high quality and rich agricultural specialties.

154

Examples include oranges, harissa, tomatoes

(due to chemical composition and high density yield technologies) and its olives (presence of

151

African Development Bank (2012),

Economic Brief - Distortions to Agricultural Policy Incentives in Tunisia: A Preliminary

Analysis

, pp. 5-11, Tunis: African Development Bank.

152

Interview conducted with Direction Générale des Études et du Développement Agricole in Tunis, May 17, 2017

153

COMCEC (2016), COMEC Agricultural Outlook 2016, pp. 55-90, Ankara: COMCEC.

154

WTO (2016),

Tunisia Trade Policy Review Report by the Secretariat

, Geneva: World Trade Organization.