Previous Page  57 / 178 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 57 / 178 Next Page
Page Background

52

Second, in terms of product offering, the

Takaful

sector has witnessed varying practices in

different jurisdictions. However, the prevailing products offered in the sector are based on

wakalah

model,

mudarabah

model, hybrid

wakalah

-

mudarabah

model, and

wakalah

with

waqf

model (Hassan, Kayed, & Oseni, 2013). Regardless of the models utilised, one key issue is the

regulatory approach for such models. For instance, different jurisdictions have varying

treatments for the surplus in

Takaful

contractual arrangements. For instance, in Malaysia, BNM

introduced guidelines for the management and distribution of surplus by TOs in its Guidelines

on

Takaful

Operational Framework 2013. The main controversy on the distribution of surplus

in

Takaful

undertakings relates to the various

Shari'ah

opinions on the issue, which is both

related to the product development on the one hand and

Shari'ah

compliance issues on the other

hand. Hence, this issue will be discussed under the third main point (Mokhtar, Abdul Aziz, & Md.

Hilal, 2015).

The third trend in

Takaful

relates to

Shari'ah

compliance. There has been a continuous debate

on the ownership of the surplus in a

Takaful

contractual arrangement. The three dominant views

of

Shari'ah

scholars are as follows:

1.

Neither the participants nor the TO owns the surplus,

2.

The surplus is exclusively owned by the

Takaful

participants,

3.

Both

Takaful

participants and TO jointly own the surplus.

While each viewpoint and its advocates have adduced evidence from the

Shari'ah

to support

their respective positions, it suffices to note that the ultimate arbiter on this issue is the regulator

or what was earlier referred to as RSA, and after being properly advised by the

Shari'ah

scholars

in such jurisdiction.

Before the eventual issuance of the regulatory framework –

Takaful

Rules for TOs in Pakistan in

2012, there was a considerable controversy in the industry championed by conventional

insurance operators that TOs might not be able to offer proper

Shari'ah

-compliant products

(Akhter & Hussain, 2012). While some have considered this move as a survival tactic, the

controversy nevertheless delayed the roll-out of

Takaful

products in Pakistan. In Pakistan, TOs

are required by regulatory prescriptions to deal with RTOs for their underwriting needs.

However, in the absence of RTOs to undertake such risks, they are permitted to deal with

conventional reinsurance companies (Htay, Hamat, Wan Ismail, & Salman, 2014).

In the UK, besides the regulatory framework provided by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)

and the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), the

Takaful

sector is largely industry-driven as

demonstrated in the efforts of the Islamic Insurance Association of London (IIAL), which

introduced its Guiding Principles in 2018 to “

provide a platform for the provision of Shari'ah-

compliant insurance (Takaful) and reinsurance (Re-Takaful) in the London market

.”

The guidelines, which are substantially based on the IFSB standards, were specifically targeted

at commercial insurers that plan to introduce

Takaful

windows. It provides a faith-based