Background Image
Previous Page  24 / 151 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 24 / 151 Next Page
Page Background

Establishing Well Functioning National Trade Facilitation Bodies (NTFBs)

In the OIC Member States

12

1.2.3.2.

TAB Index: Rankings at median point, median values, average scores, and

lowest ranking

In order to put the scores of top performers and OIC Member State countries in perspective, it is

useful to examine (i) the results of countries ranked at the median line (in overall terms); (ii) the

median values for each individual indicator; (iii) the average scores for the three indicators; and (iv)

the score of the country with the lowest ranking. The following table sets out this information.

Table 2: Median and average values of indicators and countries with overall lowest and

median rankings

WTO Members

Rank

WB Tab

2015

Exports 2015

Imports 2015

Documents Time/D

ays

Cost

USD

Documents

Time

/Days

Cost

USD

Timor-Leste

Countries at

median point

(overall)

94

6

28

410

7

26

415

Albania

95

7

19

745

8

18

730

Median for each indicator

n/a

6

17

1,200

7

19

1,420

Average scores

n/a

6

22

1,560

7

24

1,877

Uzbekistan

Lowest

ranking

189

11

54

5,090

13

104

6,452

Source: World Bank

It is noteworthy that the average and median scores for documents required for export/import are

the same, whereas the averages for the other two indicators are larger than the median values,

suggesting that a number of countries with high costs and heavy documentary requirements are

raising the averages

15

and the median scores may be better yardsticks for comparison purposes.

1.2.3.3.

General observations and the top 20 OIC performers

Table 3 presents data on the 20 OIC Member State countries that are currently most highly ranked by

the WB TAB index.

16

A number of observations can be made in relation to the performance of 54 OIC Member State

countries in the TAB Index.

First, of the 54 OIC Member State countries covered by the index, only 16 of them fall within the top

50% of performers overall. In other words, a somewhat disproportionate number of OIC Member

15

For example, an analysis of the data suggests that the cost to export exceeds USD2,000 in only 34 of the 189 countries reviewed (of

those 34 countries, three of the countries have a final overall ranking above the 153rd place) and the cost to import exceeds

USD2,000 in 50 of the 189 countries reviewed (of those 50 countries, 16 of the countries have a final overall ranking above the 153rd

place).

16

Note two tables providing this information for all OIC Member State countries are contained in Annex 1.