Previous Page  111 / 164 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 111 / 164 Next Page
Page Background

Malnutrition in the OIC Member

Countries: A Trap for Poverty

Stakeholders reported enthusiasm from other ministries and agencies; as the current system

critically lacks integration of the many nutrition-related programmes in existence.

Challenges on the Ground

Two independent stakeholders from CSO and Academia felt that the SUN Movement is not

making progress as the nutrition problems of maternal and child nutrition are stagnant.

Stunting and wasting rates remain very high, and overweight is on the rise.

The stakeholder interviews highlighted several challenges perceived to ultimately hamper the

progress of malnutrition reduction in Indonesia. The upmost challenge is the need to foster

accountability to nutrition in Indonesia. Almost half of all stakeholders agree that the existence

of regulation or an Action Plan on nutrition is often deemed a great outcome on its own,

overlooking the gap between regulation and implementation.

The above-mentioned challenge to implement nutrition policy and programmes is mostly

rooted in the suboptimal inter-sector collaboration among government agencies and multi­

stakeholder coordination between government, CSOs, International Organisations, NGOs,

private sector and academics. Although the awareness of nutrition among different sectors and

stakeholders is considered to be rising at the national level and the political commitment for

nutrition is available, several stakeholders perceive that the only highly engaged government

sectors are the Ministry of Health and Bappenas. This means that an active role from other

ministries is not yet fully seen. According to two stakeholders from government sectors,

commitment for nutrition will only be seen when the relevant sectors have pin-pointed

funding allocations and programme planning.

The third challenge is the suboptimal vertical coordination between national government at

the national level and the local governments at provincial and district levels as the actual

implementers on the ground, resulting in varied compliance between them. Ever since

decentralisation was effectively implemented in Indonesia in 2000, 34 provinces and 512

districts throughout the country have been given wide-ranging authorities. As a result, the role

of the central government is mostly a steering one, through providing guidelines, norms, and

standards. It can only reach the local government at the provincial level, and cannot directly

reach the district-level government unless the district is extremely troubled. It is the

responsibility of the provincial governments to manage and reach the district-level

governments that fall under their purview. Thus, variation in nutrition progress is inevitable.

With regard to the National Action Plan for Food and Nutrition, the big challenge is its

implementation which takes place at the sub-national level: province and district. Not all local

governments comply with the national direction to formulate the Regional Action Plan for

Food and Nutrition (RADPG] and the central government seems to be aware of the issue of low

compliance. As a stakeholder from Bappenas states, the actual challenge lays in setting-up an

effective monitoring system.

An incentive-based scheme seems required to increase compliance of local governments with

the national guidelines or directions. Six out of eight stakeholders imply the need to trigger

motivation and/or pressure for the local government to demonstrate results and impacts from

the state budget transferred by the central government. Incentive mechanisms can be initiated

through the inclusion of nutrition outcome as one of the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs] of

both Governor (at the province level] and Mayor (at the district level).

103