Previous Page  66 / 108 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 66 / 108 Next Page
Page Background

58

transportation costs to reach secondary and tertiary health care centres in Papua, for example, are

often higher than the direct medical cost – thus making access for many poor households unaffordable.

Realizing the potential detrimental effects of indirect health cost on the use of maternal and child

health services for poor households the government launched the

DAK Jampersal

programme in 2016,

which covers all non-medical cost related to maternal and child health such as transportation and

accommodation cost for pregnant mothers who want to deliver in a health facility.

Additionally, poor acceptability of some health care services, lack of trust in the quality of the services

and lack of information are other important access barriers. Several stakeholders pointed out that poor

JKN beneficiaries were often unaware of the benefits the health insurance scheme entitled them to. In

some cases, the JKN membership cards were kept at the house of village heads as poor households did

not know how and for what they should use the card. Poor acceptability could pose a barrier to access

to health services, especially to maternal and reproductive health services.

The provision of high quality services remains a challenge because the demand for services is far

greater than the supply, especially with regards to maternal, newborn and child services (WHO, 2017).

People usually expressed lower levels of trust in primary local health care providers and higher levels

of trust in hospital and specialist care. Related, the Ministry of Health struggles to attract skilled health

workers to rural and remote postings across the countries which further exuberates regional and

rural/urban disparities. To counteract this the Ministry of Health has started to offer shorter contracts

and higher enumeration for health workers in remote posts (WHO, 2017), and introduced various

policies to encourage health workers to take up positions in rural and remote parts of Indonesia. For

example, the Healthy Archipelago programme (

Nusantara Sehat

) deploys health workers to

underserved rural and remote locations for a two-year assignment. The Presidential Regulation

No.4/2017 on Compulsory Service of Specialist Doctor (WKDS), requires all specialist doctors to first

undertake 1-year long service in remote district hospitals, regional referral hospitals, and provincial

referral hospitals. The Ministry of Health pays for their salaries while local governments provide

additional incentives through their regional budget. As of 2017, 870 specialists have been deployed –

short of the target of 2,000 specialists.

Dual practice (i.e. health personnel works for both the public and the private sector) is very common

in Indonesia and frequently leads to maldistribution of health workers (and in particular specialized

doctors) away from public health facilities and towards more lucrative private practice (WHO, 2017).

Actors in Indonesia’s health system

Health service in Indonesia is mainly delivered by the public and private sector. All major

developments and improvements in the health system in the last decades have mainly been driven by

domestic political actors and initiatives (Pisani, Olivier Kok et al., 2017). However, there are a large

number of international and national NGOs that support community-based service delivery, in

particular preventive healthcare and promotion through the

Posyandu

system. At national level, NGOs

raise awareness for various health issues, do advocacy work, raise funds and work in partnership with

the government on the monitoring and evaluation of health programmes. To increase their visibility,

cooperation and sustainability NGOs have created a joined platform called the Collaboration Forum

for Indonesia Community Health Development (

Forum Kerjasama

Pengembangan Kesehatan

Masyarakat

Indonesia

/FKPKMI). All NGO activities in Indonesia are regulated and monitored by the

Law (WHO, 2017).

A number of bi-lateral donors and international agencies including AusAID, USAID, GIZ, IDB, ADB, the

World Bank, the Global Fund, WHO and UNICEF support the health systemdevelopment and operation.

Support varies and usually includes activities and substantial grants to improve specific aspects of the

health sector. For example, infectious disease control initiatives (e.g. malaria, TB, leprosy) have long

been supported by donors (in addition to government support and with high-level coordination by the