Previous Page  34 / 185 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 34 / 185 Next Page
Page Background

Improving Road Safety

in the OIC Member States

24

The model takes the road network as its frame of reference. The interventions are directly

associated with the road network and have strong spatial dimensions. The difference

between this approach and models based on safer roads, safer vehicles and safer people is

that these are placed specifically in the network context where injury related crashes occur.

The model focuses on safety interventions to prevent network failures and near failures as is

the case with, for example, air transport.

The World Bank and WHO report (Bliss & Breen, 2009) provides implementation guidelines for

road safety management capacity review projects. As mentioned earlier, an important

consideration in applying the model is that a fundamental understanding of the current road

safety situation and climate in the particular country is needed.

Figure 5

shows the implementation stages recommended by the guidelines. Ideally each

member country in the OIC should follow these implementation guidelines in assessing and/or

establishing road safety management systems. As mentioned, the review process uses a series

of checklists (see Appendix 2) as a basis for collecting the required data. The checklists have

been generalised and designed to cover all the aspects described by the road safetymanagement

model. There are 11 checklists covering aspects relating to the results, interventions and

institutional management functions. A twelfth checklist has been designed to assess the

performance and role of a lead agency.

The current project is aimed at assessing the state of road safety management in member

countries of the OIC. Due to a limited budget, full scale capacity reviews as described by the

World Bank guideline (as depicted by

Figure 5)

are not possible and the review will for the

largest part be based on a review of current practice as described in available (English)

documentation supplemented by questionnaires and interviews in a select number of countries.

However, the process described by the World Bank guideline provides the evaluation

framework for the study although the evaluation in this study will be at much lower level of

detail. The purpose is an illustrative comparison of the state of road safety management at a

fairly global level across OIC member countries, across OIC regions and with non-OIC member

countries that are considered to practice state of the art Road Safety Management. For this

reason an overview of the World Bank approach is provided as the backdrop against which this

review is provided.