Previous Page  38 / 185 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 38 / 185 Next Page
Page Background

Improving Road Safety

in the OIC Member States

28

2.

Legislation

This defines the legal framework from within which the organisations and institutions

responsible for road safety must function. It defines the responsibility, accountability,

intervention and associated institutional management functions needed to achieve the

desired result.

3.

Funding and resource allocation

This relates to financing the operational budget/s of the organisation/s responsible for road

safety management and the associated interventions needed to achieve the intended results

in a sustainable manner. It also pertains to the efficient allocation of resources based on a

rational evaluation framework (i.e. based on quantitative assessment of cost and benefit in

relation to stated objectives).

4.

Promotion

This relates to the process of communicating with the public on road safety matters and

should be a core business of government and society to emphasise the shared social

responsibility to develop, implement and support road safety improvement initiatives and

interventions that aim at meeting stated targets.

5.

Monitoring and evaluation

Monitoring and evaluation deals with the on-going and systematic measurement of road

safety performance measures and indicators in order to assess and evaluate the efficacy of

introduced measures and interventions.

6.

Research and development and technology transfer

This is an integral and essential component of any road safety management system. It relates

to the timely identification of changes in the system, the development of new techniques and

methods, the application of new knowledge and the transfer and application of knowledge to

continually improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the system in order to keep meeting

the desired results.

3.4.3

Assessing results at the interventions level

Informed by the systems and institutional management level appraisals, Checklists 2 to 5 of the

World Bank guidelines (Bliss & Breen, 2009) are used to assess the results at the intervention

level (see

Figure 8)

. The review focusses on the three broad intervention areas (planning,

operation, design and use; vehicles and drivers; and recovery and rehabilitation of crash

victims). The purpose of these questions is to probe for relationships between the intervention

and their outputs, preferably in the form of quantifiable relationships backed by documented

studies or research and focusing on safe road design, operation andmaintenance; safe roads and

roadsides; safe speeds and safe vehicles; emergency response and emergency (trauma) centre

protocols and practices.