Previous Page  32 / 185 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 32 / 185 Next Page
Page Background

Improving Road Safety

in the OIC Member States

22

To effectively manage road safety requires commitment to a results focused approach. This

commitment plays a critical role in the success or failure in meeting a country’s road safety

ambition and related targets. Without a clear national political will to commit to road safety

improvement, the chances of successfully implementing an effective road safety management

system are slim.

3.4

The Road Safety Management System in Operation

The World Report on Road Traffic Injury Prevention issued by the World Health Organization

(WHO) and the World Bank in 2004, called for a drastic improvement of global road safety. It

recommended a range of urgent measures essential for a sustainable reduction of the social and

economic impacts of road accidents.

These recommendations have since been mandated by the UN General Assembly with the

release of the Decade of Action for Road Safety. The World Bank has since commissioned the

development of Guidelines for conducting road safety capacity reviews (Bliss & Breen, 2009) to

assist countries to implement these recommendations.

These guidelines incorporate a Road Safety Management System (RSMS) that was derived from

the pyramid model developed in New Zealand (LTSA, 2000) and applied in the SUNflower

projects (Koornstra et al., 2002; Morsink et al., 2005). Although there are other reports that

describe the Safe Systems Approach, for example the OECD Towards Zero - Ambitious Road

Safety Targets and the Safe System Approach (OECD, 2008); the methodology described in the

SUNflower project (Koornstra, et. al 2002) and the Sustainable Safety approach (Wegman and

Aarts, 2005), the Road Safety Management System (RSMS, see

Figure 4)

, developed for the

World Bank (Bliss and Breen, 2009) has many generic components that allow for it to be applied

to all countries and irrespective of the status of development or road safety performance in that

country. The guidelines introduce a systematic review process that is supported by checklists

and questionnaires. Although the guideline is intended for general use, the review process

described assumes the input of road safety experts and not merely a mechanistic process of

following a checklist or completing a questionnaire and trusting the outcomes. The reviewers

must have a thorough understanding of road safety and be able to probe and investigate issues

underlying reported problems. That requires experience, knowledge and understanding of all

aspects related to road safety and road safety management.