Previous Page  182 / 298 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 182 / 298 Next Page
Page Background

Risk Management in Transport PPP Projects

In the Islamic Countries

163

generally reflects the phases of the supervising and monitoring activities performed by the

Fund.

According to the World Bank Procuring Infrastructure Report on PPPs in Algeria for the year

2018, the following types of analysis are performed in practice as part of the preparation of the

major projects and PPP initiatives in Algeria:

Cost-Benefit Analysis

and analysis of socio-economic impacts;

Affordability assessment

, including the identification of the required long term public

commitments (explicit and implicit, direct and contingent liabilities);

Risk analysis

including risk identification, allocation and assessment;

Public sector comparator and Value-for-Money

analysis to assess whether the project

is best implementable under the PPP or public procurement models;

Project

bankability

assessment;

Market

assessment.

Box 26 Development and preparation of the PPP initiative for the Bejaia Mediterranean

Terminal - BMT

At the end of the 1990s, beginning of the 2000s the management of the Port of Bejaia Public Owned

Enterprise (Enterprise Portuaire de Bejaia - EPB) and of its hinterland logistics zone (Zone

Logistique Extra Portuaire – ZLEP) identified the main gap of this logistic node in the lack of

adequate port and hinterland logistics infrastructure, equipment and technical skills and

competences to operate in the growing global container market. Within this context EPB elaborated

in 2004-2006 a port development plan foreseeing the need to establish a PPP for the design,

financing, operation and maintenance of a container terminal at the port of Bejaia. In parallel EPB

also prepared a business plan to be used as a base case for the setup of the PPP. This foresaw the

development and implementation of the project according to the adoption of the institutional PPP

model, requiring the setup of a public-private SPV. The business plan included details concerning

the objectives and scope of the partnership, its duration, the financing structure of the project, the

role and responsibilities of the partners, their specific tasks and related time-schedule (Aoumad,

2017).

On the basis of the business plan elaborated for the project EPB started looking for potential private

candidates. The selection of the private partner was made on the basis of a direct negotiation which

resulted in the appointment of Portek International Pte Ltd. Based on instructions from the

Ministry of Public Works and Transport a consultation process to collect expressions of interests

from the market was also made. The appointment of Portek resulted in the signature of a JV

agreement, which occurred in 2003. This specified the roles and responsibilities of the two entities

within the SPV. EPB would have be responsible for the provision of the basic terminal port

infrastructure including quay, terminal area and its interconnection with the railway network.

Portek would have provided the superstructure facilities and equipment, including ICT technology

for its operation (Aoumad, 2017).