Previous Page  125 / 298 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 125 / 298 Next Page
Page Background

Risk Management in Transport PPP Projects

In the Islamic Countries

106

PPP contractual arrangements

Ivorian law recognizes

two broad categories of contracts

for the financing, construction,

operation, servicing and maintenance of infrastructure and public assets

39

. Both these

contractual forms allow a contracting authority to assign to the private entity the responsibility

to operate an asset for the specific purpose of providing a public service. The main difference of

the two categories relate to the type of remuneration: in the first category (partnership

agreements), a private sector entity is paid a fee by the public part for building/renovating and

operating an infrastructure; in the second category (concession agreements), the contract

holder generates revenue through the commercial operation of a project (in particular the fees

paid by users). In the case of public funding partnership agreement, the remuneration of the

contractor needs to be linked to performance objectives assigned to it.

As such, the public authority has to determine the exact nature of the contract that is agreed,

taking into account the services to be performed and the payment conditions of the private

entity. In both concession and partnership agreements, the public authority can assign the

design, build and operation of a project to a private entity (i.e. Build-Operate-Transfer or Build-

Operate-Own-Transfer agreements, which are by far the most common type of partnership in

use in Côte d’Ivoire). However, the public authority may also decide to assign only the rights to

the management of a public project that has already been built (i.e. Transfer of Operation Rights

contracts).

The responsibilities and obligations of each party of a PPP are precisely defined in each specific

contractual agreement. However, a typical allocation of risks in BOT transport infrastructure

projects in Côte d’Ivoire is summarized in the Table below.

Table 28: Indicative risk matrix in transport PPPs in Côte d’Ivoire (by risk category)

Risk type

Risk category

Usual allocation of risks (public/private/shared)

Context-

related

risks

Political and

legal risks

In general terms, the

public party

in Côte d'Ivoire bears responsibility

for political events outside the control of the private partner, for changes

in the regulatory and legislative system and guarantees the grantor

exclusivity to operate the infrastructure and/or services scope of the PPP

contract.

Macroeconomic

risks

Macroeconomic risks are

shared

. Inflation risks during construction are

typically borne by the private partner, while inflation risks during the

concession term are typically primarily borne by the public authority.

Currency risks are allocated based on the currency used in the contract

but are also partially mitigated by the inclusion in the larger UEMOA

monetary area, which is linked with a fixed exchange rate to the EURO.

39

A third catefory of contracts exists for the delgation of public services, therore not relevant for the transpor

infastructure sector.