Previous Page  50 / 213 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 50 / 213 Next Page
Page Background

Improving Transport Project Appraisals

In the Islamic Countries

36

Effect maximisation

: an analysis of which alternative yields the highest level of desired

effects on society; these effects need to be made comparable by monetisation or doing a

partial MCA. This method is only appropriate for alternatives with more or less the same cost,

which does not apply to our list of ten transport projects.

In

MCA

one does not try to express all effects in one dimension (money), which is a strong

limitation in comparison to CBA, but

several dimensions are used at the same time

. Criteria can

be measured in money units, minutes, grams, decibels or even be qualitative (e.g. ranking of

projects on a criterion). The overall assessment of a project or the ranking of different projects,

using all the criteria, takes place by using criterion weights, which form an expression of political

priorities. MCA also scores high on providing transparency. It requires less work to prepare the

effects sheet than in CBA for the costs and benefits, and can take into account effects that are not

in money or not even quantified. Two important disadvantages are that several MCA methods

are quite elaborated in their processing of the effects sheet and that they require importance

weights for the criteria. These are often hard to come by/agree on.

Ad 2) Items of a project appraisal

The standard content of project appraisal (as laid out in guidance documents, if present) can be

assessed by identifying which items are required or recommended. A typical appraisal report

includes the following items:

Description of the context,

Project identification and objectives,

Demand analysis,

Technical design of the project,

Management and time plan,

Financial analysis,

Economic analysis,

Risk assessment.

Clearly, the content reflects the purpose of the appraisal and the methodological approach

followed. For example, while the EC requires to perform a financial analysis, which is used to

assess the financing gap and therefore the calculation of the EU grant, in the UK only an economic

analysis is asked for. Regardless methodological specificities, a trade-off exists between setting

mandatory requirements (including standard template) and establishing a minimum set of

contents. The

EU cohesion policy

legislation for 2014-2020 (article 101 of Regulation (EU) No

1303/2013) provides an example of mandatory content for major project appraisals (see

further in section 3.3.4)

The extent to which elements are mandatory in CBA for different OECD countries is presented

i

n Figure 1.9 .