Previous Page  45 / 213 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 45 / 213 Next Page
Page Background

Improving Transport Project Appraisals

In the Islamic Countries

31

Developing

software or IT tools, such as templates and spreadsheets to support routine calculation

is another way to enhance standardisation

. Lithuania for example has developed a standardised

spreadsheet as computational tool provided by the central planning agency to all line ministries

and procurement agencies developing capital investment projects. The spreadsheet enables the

automatic calculation of key indicators and other aspects (e.g. the treatment of VAT). Observed

benefits of this system are a reduction in mistakes and inaccuracies as well as easier and shorted

evaluation processes. An additional reported benefit is also that less specific knowledge is

needed, however this

risks also to be a weakness of the system if it ends in a too mechanical

exercise

without thorough technical

12

ownership of the key assumptions and features of the

project appraisal.

In example of a transport-specific

comprehensive set of tools and guidelines is

WebTAG

(Web-

based Transport Analysis Guidance) developed by the

UK government

(see further in section

3.1.4). Instead, the

Highway Development and Management (HDM-4)

model is an example of a

commercial software package, which serves as a tool for the analysis, planning, management

and appraisal of roadmaintenance, improvements and investment decisions.

HDM-4

is regularly

used as the WB’s model for appraising road investment proposals in developing countries.

Finally, standardizing

project presentation

formats can be a powerful means to communicate

appraisal assumptions and results, thereby aiding the comparison of different projects

appraisal. The fact that assumptions are clearly identifiable allowing for replicability of the

analysis is a key feature of an appraisal report which requires to be carefully assessed as a part

of the content requirements. This is the system adopted by

INEA

an EU executive agency in

charge of implementing the

Connecting Europe Facility

13

. The agency requires applicants in calls

for proposals to adhere to the EC CBA Guide, but leaves flexibility in the way the CBA are

performed. Nonetheless, regardless the specific model adopted, it requires to present the CBA

results according to a defined Cash Flow Template, organised in such a way as to make easier

the access and understanding of data and results by the appraisers

14

.

1.2.4

Content

As regards the technical dimension, the analysis focuses on how transport project appraisal is

carried out. In particular, three main elements are to be firstly examined when assessing project

appraisal practices: a) Methodology; b) Items; c) Risk assessment.

12

https://www.piarc.org/en/knowledge-base/road-assets-management/HDM-4-Software/

13

https://ec.europa.eu/inea/en/welcome-to-innovation-networks-executive-agency

14

https://ec.europa.eu/inea/en/connecting-europe-facility/cef-transport/apply-funding/2018-cef-transport-call-

proposals