Previous Page  36 / 213 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 36 / 213 Next Page
Page Background

Improving Transport Project Appraisals

In the Islamic Countries

22

Figure 1.4: Timing when is CBA is prepared

Source: CSIL processing OECD survey data

As a good practice the appraisal

shall be conducted at a sufficiently early phase of the project

preparation, when project alternatives are still to be selected

and the option analysis can thus be

performed to identify alternatives which are not only technically, but also strategically different

from each other. When carried out at later stages, the appraisal faces the trade-off of either being

purely compliance-driven (if according obligations exist) becoming a justification for choices

which have already been taken rather than instrumental for policy learning and future planning.

A

best practice is however to have project appraisal going along the entire project design and

preparation cycle

it can better inform and assist the entire decision-making process. This is

explicitly recognised by the

UK Green Book

2003

which states: “Appraisals are often iterated a

number of times before their proposals are implemented in full. (…) In particular, as options are

developed, it will usually be important to review more than once the impact of risks,

uncertainties and inherent biases. This helps to avoid spurious accuracy, and to provide a

reasonable understanding of whether, in the light of changing circumstances, the proposal is

likely to remain good value for money. As the stages of an assessment progress, data must be

refined to become more specific and accurate.”

1.2.2

Governance of project appraisal

Institutional arrangements for the coordination andmanagement of project appraisal is a crucial

variable in the identification of systems. While the administrative structure and tradition of a

country or international organisation depend on a multitude of historic factors, three elements

come to the forefront for the purposes of the present study and can be singled out to structure

the analysis: a) Distinction of roles; b) Quality review; and c) Publicity.

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

In the pre-feasibility stage when

several project alternatives should be

assessed

In the feasibility phase, when the

preferred project alternative is already

chosen

It is prepared at an earlier stage and

then updated during the whole project

preparation phase