Previous Page  32 / 213 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 32 / 213 Next Page
Page Background

Improving Transport Project Appraisals

In the Islamic Countries

18

1.2.1

Legal basis of project appraisal

Project appraisal effectiveness in improving resource allocation is linked to the enforcement and

promotion of its proper and timely use. The degree and level of prescription that rule the

assessment of transport project appraisal practices is the first element to be examined within a

public investment management system. This aspect includes three elements: a) the existence

and specification of legal requirements; b) the precise definition of its scope of application; c)

the definition of its timing.

Table 1.1: Elements of the legal basis aspect

Aspect

Elements included

Legal basis of

project

appraisal

1.

Legal requirement

: which type of requirement is in place, if any? Is there

a legal requirement to carry out transport project appraisal or it is it simply a

recommended practice? Does the obligation define appraisal objectives,

features and methodology to be used?

2.

Scope of application

: is the requirement for project appraisals common to

all public investments (above a specific cost threshold) or is it specific for the

transport sector? Is the project appraisal system diversified depending on the

scale and typology of the project? is the appraisal performed on individual

projects or on strategies?

3.

Timing

: during the project preparation phase when is project appraisal

usually prepared? is the project appraisal development performed ‘early’

enough in the process when project alternatives are still to be selected?

Ad 1) Requirement

The first point concerns which type of requirement to carry out transport project appraisal is in

place, if any. Project appraisal can be carried out because of a

precise legal obligation to do so, or

simply because it is a recommended exercise

. In any case, the decision to perform project

appraisal should not be left to the initiative of project promoters or funding agency, it should be

promoted and enforced, possibly by law.

Different practices are in place in the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development

(OECD) countries related to legal requirement to perform Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA), from

nationally mandatory requirements to sector/institution specific practices, as presented in

Figure 1.2.

For instance, in

Chile

, there is a legal requirement for all public sector investment

projects and programmes to be evaluated including (as of early 2010) infrastructure

concessions funded by the private sector.

Instead, in both the

United Kingdom

and the

Netherlands

there is no legal requirement, but CBA is recommended by government and used

anyway (see 3.1.1 and 3.2.1).