Previous Page  201 / 228 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 201 / 228 Next Page
Page Background

Infrastructure Financing through Islamic

Finance in the Islamic Countries

185

6 Summary of the Findings and Conclusion

Most of the infrastructure projects are bulky, complex, have long-lives and require large

amounts of investments with long-term maturities. The nature of the projects introduces

different types of risks that can inhibit investments from the private sector. Given these

features, the infrastructure sector necessitates long-term planning and the creation of a

supporting environment that can create incentives for the private sector to invest. The private

sector participates in infrastructure projects under the public-private partnership (PPP)

framework and a concession arrangement. After reviewing the relevant literature and

examining case studies from six countries, this report identifies various policies that can be

undertaken to enhance the role of Islamic finance in promoting infrastructure development.

This chapter presents the important issues arising in different aspects of infrastructure

financing and highlights the key policies that can enhance the role of Islamic finance in

promoting sustainable infrastructure development in OIC member countries.

6.1.

Issues and Policies at the National Level

Most of the OIC countries have deficits in the stock of infrastructure and require investments

in different infrastructure sectors. Since the gaps of infrastructure are enormous and require

large amounts of investments, long-term strategies and medium and short-term plans are

needed to identify the projects that will be implemented. In this regard, a pipeline of projects

that are essential for the long-term economic growth of the economy needs to be identified by

a government agency or public body. Moving forward, there is a need to also explore newer

technologies that can be used to implement sustainable infrastructure projects that satisfy

economic, environmental and social objectives.

Since infrastructure projects are large and complex, the PPP framework needs to be well

structured and implemented. Other than having a separate government entity that deals with

PPP arrangements, some further supporting services could reduce uncertainties and

encourage private sector participation in developing infrastructure projects. These can include

a public body providing advisory services on PPP implementation ex-ante and providing

guarantees of execution of the PPP terms by the government after the contract is signed.

The long-term nature of infrastructure financing would also require a sound and predictable

legal system that can support long-term and complex contracts. While this can be done by

having an enabling concession, PPP and sector-specific laws and regulations, the public

procurement regime framework should also be open, transparent and competitive.

Furthermore, there has to be an enabling legal and regulatory environment for different

Islamic finance sectors. This would require supportive financial laws for Islamic banks,

nonbank financial institutions and capital market instruments, including sukuk, and also the

changing of the tax regime to one that levels the playing field for Islamic finance. The report

suggests that developing a standardized Shariah-compliant contract format that can be used in

different PPP projects would be helpful in promoting the involvement of Islamic finance in

infrastructure investments since this will be able to reduce contractual costs and legal risks.

The bulk of the infrastructure investments are still carried out by the government. Although

government budgets allocate funds for projects, in some countries government linked

companies (GLCs) are established to develop and operate different infrastructure assets. The

GLCs provide infrastructure services such as electricity and telecommunications in an