Background Image
Previous Page  51 / 186 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 51 / 186 Next Page
Page Background

Urban Transport in the OIC Megacities

41

correctly pricing fuel and reducing fuel subsides. In Indonesia, for example, the government is

pursuing reforms to reduce market distortion. India’s planned “green surcharge” on petrol, “green

cess” on personal vehicles, and “urban transport tax” on the purchase of new cars and two wheelers

are also notable. Raising additional financing through local sources is an important opportunity that

national governments could pursue to fund sustainable transport projects demanded by local areas.

Although local taxing capabilities are very limited in many countries, it can also be an option of local

funding and an opportunity to channel resources to each city’s particular needs (WRI, 2013; World

Bank, 2002).

Finally, in order to ensure the effectiveness of financing it is absolutely necessary to increase the

effectiveness of the current decision making processes that typically fail to take into account the full

economic, social, and environmental consequences of transport policies, programs, and projects.

National governments can increase the effectiveness of financing decisions by following a structured

process starting with needs assessment, planning and policy formulation, implementation,

monitoring, and finally ex post evaluation. Financing based on performance outcomes should be a

practice followed by both national governments and international funding organizations. One

potential method of impact evaluation is a scorecard with mandatory and recommended outcomes,

including safeguards for mitigating environmental, social, and other risks (WRI, 2013).

3.9.

Health

3.9.1.

Introduction

Unsustainable transport practices, particularly the intensive use of private motorized transport, have

serious indirect impacts on public health. Air pollution is probably the most commonly mentioned

cause of transport related health problems but the urban heat island effect, increased noise pollution

and the lower activity levels are equally important. In addition, it is now widely accepted that the

environmental impact of transport and therefore its impacts on health, are exacerbated in an

unpredictable way by climate change. (Campbell-Lendrum and Corvalan, 2007).

Air pollution from transportation can be caused by several factors such as excessive vehicle use, age

of fleet and technology used, poor maintenance of vehicles, and unavailability or improper use of

appropriate fuels. Air pollution from motorized transport in cities is an increasing threat for public

health in megacities, much of which is generated by motorized transport. Pollutant emissions such as

NO

x

and PM

10

are the biggest concern for local air quality in urban areas as they contribute to a range

of cardiovascular, pulmonary and respiratory diseases, leading to an estimated 3.2 million deaths a

year across the world. For 2010, theWorld Bank estimated the total number of deaths due to transport

related air pollution was at a minimum of 184,000 per year. Urban air pollution is estimated to cost

approximately 2% of GDP in developed countries and 5% in developing countries (Rode et al, 2014).

The impacts of transport on health differ significantly between developed and developing megacities.

Results suggest that some megacities like Los Angeles, New York, Osaka Kobe, Sao Paulo and Tokyo

have very low excess cases in total mortality from transport related pollutants. In contrast, the

approximate numbers of cases is highest in Karachi (15,000/year) characterised by a very high

concentration of total suspended particles (670 μg/m

3

). The highest cardiovascular mortality rates

are found in Dhaka (7000/year), Beijing (5500/year), Karachi (5200/year), Cairo (5000/year) and

Delhi (3500/ year). The morbidity (hospital admissions) due to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary

Disease (COPD) caused by air pollution follows the tendency of cardiovascular mortality. Dhaka and

Karachi lead the rankings, having about 2100/year excess cases, while Osaka-Kobe (20/year) and Sao

Paulo (50/year) are at the low end of all megacities considered (Gurjar et al, 2010).

Along with the accidents and air pollution, increasing levels of motorization also result in a reduction

in the total physical activity levels. Physical inactivity and its effect on the prevalence of non-