Background Image
Previous Page  57 / 186 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 57 / 186 Next Page
Page Background

Urban Transport in the OIC Megacities

47

developing world to continue growing, not as replicas of the cities in the West, but as models for

sustainable development (Banister, 2011).

A carbon free vision needs to combine all the best practice that was described in the previous sections,

both in terms of planning and governance. There should be a clear future city vision or spatial strategy

that is affordable, adaptable and implementable, and this requires strong institutions and governance

structures for the city. Policy effectiveness needs to be clearly explained and accepted by the full range

of involved stakeholders, through their involvement in the process. Finally, the ownership of the land

in the city is the key factor in the success of such a vision as for real change to take place, there needs

to be direct intervention by city governments. Currently, in most cities the land is either owned and

managed by low income groups or sold to developers in order to build large, unconnected and

expensive superblocks. Transport should be seen as part of the new and existing developments where

some of the benefits can be released through value capture. Sustainable transport and poverty

alleviation should be seen as complementary issues and should be moving to the same direction

(Banister, 2011).

3.11. Social Exclusion

3.11.1. Introduction

Poor transport, both in developed and developing economies, is one of the factors contributing to

social exclusion. Not everyone who experiences social exclusion will necessarily have a transport

problem, and not everyone with transport problems is at risk of social exclusion. For some people,

transport can be a major factor limiting their opportunities, while for others, it may not be very

important compared to other problems such as poor education. In many cases, car access makes a

huge difference to quality of life and access to jobs, education, health care and shops (Social Exclusion

Unit, 2003).

Transport related social exclusion can take different forms for different groups of a society, different

societies and different modes of transport. In both developed and developing economies, the most

vulnerable groups are the urban poor, the aging population, the women and the people with

disabilities. The analysis provided on this section is non exhaustive and is focusing on the most

common transport related social exclusion problems in the megacities of the developed and the

developing world.

3.11.2. Transport related social exclusion in megacities of developed countries

Transport related social exclusion in developed world megacities is very often linked to the unequal

distribution of access opportunities to employment. Economic and time based exclusion refer to the

failure of the transport systems to enable employed or unemployed individuals to access the labour

markets that match their professional skills. For example, the concentration of highly skilled

individuals in central employment areas in London means that a very large number of the population

that does not live in the central area of the city relies heavily on the reliability of the public transport

network. The contribution of other factors, such as housing affordability is crucial to economic and

time based exclusion (Church et al, 2000).

In terms of gender and transport related social exclusion, it is generally considered that men and

women have the same access opportunities to transport in the developed world. However, a

substantial part of academic research has examined whether women’s access opportunities are

actually able to cover their mobility needs. The modernist urban land use planning principles have

been openly criticised as male oriented and unable to adequately serve an employed woman’s needs.

It is considered that the impact of automobile oriented transport planning and its lack of coordination

with land use planning, is significantly higher on women due to their complex mobility patterns. The

improvement of accessibility and mobility opportunities for women can have wider social benefits as