Previous Page  162 / 231 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 162 / 231 Next Page
Page Background

Diversification of Islamic Financial Instruments

148

orientation from a ‘financer-intermediator-entrepreneur’ towards a ‘financer-entrepreneur’

model. The ensued global focus on P2P lending, crowd funding, angel investing, mobile

banking and other similar modes of financing is a proof. These not only have created better

opportunities for financial inclusion but have tended to improve the overall social fabric via

improved trusteeship and risk sharing. The same focus is recommend for Oman, particular in

view of tanfeedh, the AlRafdh and Ethmar funds for SMEs and venture capital.

What is crucially noteworthy is the fact that the fintech driven, new age, finance is in complete

actuality, application of basic Islamic Finance i.e. reliance on risk sharing based Mudaraba and

Musharaka financing. In a typical risk sharing arrangement such as equity finance, parties

share the risk as well as the rewards of a contract. Assets are invested in remunerative trade

and production activities. The return to assets are not known at the instant assets are invested,

akin to Arrow-Debreu securities. Oman’s welcome adoption of Islamic finance has created a

valuable opportunity to help meet its economic diversification needs by resorting and

branding itself as a ‘New Age Islamic Fintech Finance; that is oriented towards

entrepreneurship and financial inclusion, research and innovation. The recent new age Waqf

Forum (2017) in Oman and other similar preliminary initiatives via CBFS are steps in right

direction. Moreover, initiative (WIFE, 2016), of amalgamating waqf with crowd funding via

Fintech (see

worldwaqf.org

) is another insight for Tanfeed initiatives.

Moreover, to complement the achievement and pursuant sustainability of the above,

innovative approaches to promote Islamic capital markets and other important areas are

investment banking, stock markets, trade and crops financing, and the payments system. The

promotion of stock markets can play an important role in Islamic finance

103

. This is so since in

an Islamic system version 2.0, investment banks would not provide loans but would

participate as shareholders. Depositors in these banks would own marketable equity shares

that could be traded on the stock market according to market prices. Since depositors are

generally risk-averse, they would invest only in shares that provide the risk-return profile they

would seek. This will in turn lead banks to select the most profitable projects. Thus, financial

resources would not receive their true opportunity cost where the surplus fund holder nor the

entrepreneur would be exploited, complying with the Verse 275 Chapter 2 of the Qur’an (See,

for example, Mirakhor and Shaukat, 2015 and Shaukat 2015/16).

Shaukat, (2016) suggest that, for example, oil revenue dried GCC countries like Oman and even

debt ridden Eurozone countries can finance its capital spending through equity participation in

the form of public-private partnership. One of the most promising instruments that would

allow governments to improve risk sharing is the category of instruments called

‘macromarket’ securities that can allow people to mitigate risks to their income and countries

to enhance international risk sharing

104

. Governments can easily tap the equity premiums: that

is the excessive return on equity and equity instruments versus the returns on risk free assets

such as government bonds. For example, a Eurozone country can finance its capital spending

103

As has been argued in Shaukat and Alhabshi (2015), the interest-based credit system has considerably reduced the

efficiency of these markets as it provides credit for speculation and creates abundant liquidity which distorts the returns on

equities and results in price crashes. Returns become more related to speculation and share prices appreciation and only

weakly related to the fundamentals of the company.

104

This type of risk sharing instruments has been proposed by analysts for some time now. Shiller (2003), the first to

suggest this type of “macromarket” instruments, believes that the benefits of risk sharing are substantial but have yet

materialized due to the limited availability of appropriate instruments.