Previous Page  97 / 164 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 97 / 164 Next Page
Page Background

Malnutrition in the OIC Member

Countries: A Trap for Poverty

Poor households are more likely than others to use negative coping strategies in times of crisis,

such as a reduction of the daily intake of meat, poultry and fish and dietary diversity in general

- insufficient dietary diversity is prevalent across 58% of poor households, compared to 23%

of the non-poor (Ramadan 2015). Furthermore, particularly the poor rely on subsidized bread;

and whereas Egypt's share of dietary energy from cereals, roots and tubers, and average

protein supply are above world average, protein supply from animal origin is well below world

average.

FAO data confirm that Egypt has not increased much its food production since 2004/06: it

went up by 18% over the period 2006-2013. However, the average food deficit is low, at 12

kilocalories per days, and the proportion of undernourished people always remained below

5% since 1990/92 (FAO 2015).

Health, Water and Sanitation

The health, water and sanitation picture of Egypt is very contrasted. On the one hand, there is a

near universal access to improved sanitation and drinking water source (95% and 99%,

respectively) and a complete absence of open defecation since 2008. On the other hand, Egypt

does badly on treatment of diarrhoea (only

2 2

% of children are given oral rehydration and

continuous feeding, which is in the bottom 10% of the world distribution). Healthcare supply

is also particularly deficient: in 2012 there were only 0.5 beds per 1,000 people in Egypt,

which is in the bottom 5% worldwide (it is the joint 13thlowest). And things are getting worse

as there were still 2.2 beds per 1,000 people in 2005. Maternal mortality, is however, slightly

lower than the world median (the lifetime risk of maternal mortality was 0.12% in 2015,

against a median of 0.17%).

Egypt has also made good progress on the coverage of antenatal care: in 2014, 90% of

pregnant women received antenatal care (which corresponds to the world average), against

only 74% in 2008. In the EDHS 2014, women who had given birth during the 5 years preceding

the survey, were asked a battery of questions about pre-natal care, including the intake of iron

supplements, intestinal worms precautions, whether they were weighed, had blood pressure

measured, urine and blood samples taken, and whether they were informed about potential

complications to their pregnancies. 31.3% of women giving birth in the five years preceding

the EDHS 2014 data collection, received vitamin A in the first two months after the delivery of

the last-born child; 64.6% of women took iron tablets or syrup at least for parts of the

pregnancy; and 90.2% of women lived in households with iodized salt during the last

pregnancy. However, only 3.3% of pregnant mothers took deworming medication. The quality

of antenatal care was highly dependent on whether mothers had regular and frequent

antenatal visits: for example, 72% of mothers with regular care (four antenatal visits or more)

prior to the last birth, received or bought iron supplements opposed to 26% of mothers who

had none.

The quality of the care also varied with demographic and socioeconomic characteristics. For

example, urban, higher educated and wealthier mothers and mothers who earned cash were

more likely to have received the recommended antenatal care than rural, lesser educated,

poorer mothers and mothers who did not get paid or got paid in-kind. Of particular concern is

if the quality of pregnancy care decreased with higher birth orders because with increasing

numbers of birth children, women and babies are at higher risks of complications.

89