Previous Page  120 / 164 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 120 / 164 Next Page
Page Background

Malnutrition in the OIC Member

Countries: A Trap for Poverty

COMCEC

Relationships between Child and Maternal Malnutrition

With a prevalence of low birth weight of 22% in 2014 (the tenth highest rate in the world),

Bangladesh face a serious issue of intergenerational transmission of malnutrition. It is worth

noting that this is not specific to Bangladesh but extends to the whole region (the proportion of

low birth weight is 32% in Pakistan and 28% in India, for instance).

Table 16 p

resents the results of multivariate regressions predicting child current malnutrition

on the long-term nutritional status of their mother. For Bangladesh, the information on

children' weight at birth is not known, so the analysis relies instead on the subjective

assessment of their mother. A child is considered to be of low weight at birth if their mother

describes them as “smaller than average” or “very small” at birth. 18% of children were of low

birth according to this definition.

Both mothers' stature and low birth weight strongly affect children malnutrition status.

Children whose mother is stunted are close to twice as likely to be wasted, and about 2.3 times

more likely to be stunted than others. Similarly, children who were of low weight at birth are

about 2.2 more likely to be wasted and at least 85% more likely to be stunted than others. All

these effects are strongly significant statistically.

Overweight is not significantly related to mother's stature or low birth weight status.

Table 16: Estimations of the Effects on Children Malnutrition of LowBirth Weight and

Malnutrition of their Mothers, Bangladesh

(

1

)

(

2

)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(

6

)

Wasting Wasting Stunting Stunting Overweight Overweight

Mother

is

1

90***

1

84***

2.34***

2.18***

1 . 01

1.13

stunted

(0.14)

(0.15)

(0.17)

(0.18)

(0.26)

(0.31)

Low

birth 2.51***

2.25***

2

.

0 1

***

1.85***

0.77

0.87

weight*

(

0

.

2 2

)

(

0

.

2 1

)

(0.17)

(0.18)

(0.28)

(0.34)

Age child

1

04***

1

04***

1.05***

1

07***

0.98

0.99

(

0

.

0 0

)

(

0

.

0 0

)

(

0

.

0 0

)

(

0

.

0 0

)

(

0

.

0 1

)

(

0

.

0 2

)

Girl

0.84**

0.83**

0

7 4

***

0.73***

1.33

1.48

(0.06)

(0.07)

(0.05)

(0.06)

(0.35)

(0.41)

Controls

No

Yes

No

Yes

No

Yes

Observations

4037

3628

4037

3628

4037

3628

Note: authors' calculations based on the BDHS (2014) data. Coefficients are odds ratios andfigures in parentheses

refer to standard errors. *: p<0.1, **: p<0.05, ***: p<0.001.

Malnutrition and Poverty in the National Development Strategy

The government ranks 14th out of 45 countries for its commitment to reduce hunger and

malnutrition (te Lintelo and Lakshman 2015]. This corresponds to a “moderate” level of

commitment, and puts Bangladesh in the same group as e.g. Indonesia, the Gambia or Mali. It

turns out that Bangladesh has a much stronger commitment to reducing malnutrition (for

which it ranks 9th) than hunger (for which it only ranks 20th). Positive elements attesting to the

commitment to reduce malnutrition include the existence of a nutrition budget, a very high

coverage of vitamin A supplementation (97%), government's promotion of complementary

feeding, the existence of a national nutrition plan which is multi-sectoral and entails a

112