Previous Page  57 / 225 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 57 / 225 Next Page
Page Background

Forced Migration in the OIC Member Countries:

Policy Framework Adopted by Host Countries

47

protection in these countries, they often encounter restrictions on their right to work or

ability to move freely within the country.

General adherence to the 1951 Convention

All states in East Africa except Eritrea and South Sudan have signed and ratified the 1951

Convention. Of OIC member states in the region, Djibouti, Mozambique, Sudan, and Uganda

have passed national legislation creating asylum systems, while Somalia has not.

172

Uganda,

Ethiopia, and Kenya, the three major refugee-hosting countries in East Africa, all draw on the

1969 OAU Convention’s expanded definition of a refugee.

173

However, all three place certain

restrictions on the rights set out by the 1951 Convention, specifically the freedom of

movement.

Many regional initiatives, but little commitment or meaningful change

There have been several international and regional initiatives designed to serve as fora to

discuss issues related to migration and humanitarian protection. One that appears promising

is the Intergovernmental Authority on Development’s (IGAD) Regional Consultative Process

on Migration (RCP) and Regional Migration Policy Framework. The RCP brings together the

six member states of IGAD (Kenya, Ethiopia, Uganda, Djibouti, Somalia and Sudan) in regional

dialogue on migration issues, usually producing recommendations on protecting migrants and

refugee rights. Additionally, the Regional Migration Policy Framework established in 2013 by

IGAD provides strong policy guidelines on protecting migrants’ rights and refugees and

encouraging free movement within the region.

174

However, the implementation of such

recommendations remains a challenge, and other regional initiatives have struggled due to

various barriers, including a lack of resources and political will.

175

A lack of durable solutions

Though several East African countries host large numbers of refugees, most follow a “care and

maintenance” approach to protection, providing refugees with a basic level of subsistence and

security until they are able to return home. This process is often facilitated by return

agreements between UNHCR and the countries of asylum and origin to ensure that returns are

orderly and voluntary, such as the Tripartite Agreement Governing the Voluntary Repatriation

of Somali Refugees Living in Kenya, signed in 2013.

176

At the moment however, the outlook for

tackling the root causes of displacement (e.g. violence, insecurity, and a lack of livelihood

opportunities) in places like South Sudan or Somalia—and thus facilitating any large-scale

172

The quality of some of these national asylum systems has been questioned, however. For example, the Sudanese

government has recognized many Eritreans, Syrians, Somalis, and Ethiopians as refugees, but there have been reports of

asylum seekers being detained for illegal entry. U.S. Department of State, “Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for

2015: Sudan,” accessed June 1, 2016,

http://www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/hrrpt/humanrightsreport/index.htm?year=2015&dlid=252733 .

173

In Kenya the two conventions technically provide different statuses, though UNHCR still typically performs refugee

status determination and in practice the two are conflated with little, if any, distinction. Tamara Wood, “Expanding

Protection in Africa? Case Studies of the Implementation of the 1969 African Refuge Convention’s Expanded Refugee

Definition,”

International Journal of Refugee Law

26, no. 4 (2016): 572.

174

Horwood and Hooper,

Protection on the Move

, 16

175

The Regional Mixed Migration Committee for the Horn of Africa and Yemen held meetings on the topic in 2011 and 2013,

but there has been minimal cooperation outside of these meetings. Furthermore, of six mixed migration task forces created

by UNHCR and IOM, only two, those for Kenya and Yemen, have met with any regularity in recent years. Horwood and

Hooper,

Protection on the Move

, 16.

176

The text of this agreement can be found here: UNHCR, “Tripartite Agreement between the Government of the Republic of

Kenya, the Government of the Federal Republic of Somalia and the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees

Governing the Voluntary Repatriation of Somali Refugees Living in Kenya, 2013,” accessed August 29, 2016,

http://www.refworld.org/pdfid/5285e0294.pdf.