Background Image
Previous Page  25 / 186 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 25 / 186 Next Page
Page Background

Urban Transport in the OIC Megacities

15

Figure 1: Relationship between transport and land use

Source: Rodrigue et al, 2013

3.3.2.2.

Land use and urban form of megacities in developed countries

The combination of the features of 20

th

century modernism and rise of the automobile before and

mostly after World War II created some distinct, particularly unsustainable urban land use patterns

in many of the cities of the developed world. On the one hand, the urban planning ideology of

modernism introduced separation of the uses of the city and emphasized free standing individual

buildings that did not relate an urban context, a history or a local community. On the other hand, as

automobile technology developed, it made it possible for a city to develop in any direction and at lower

densities. In addition, as a reaction to the industrial city, town planning began separating functions by

zoning, followed by decentralization and dispersion of the city (Gehl, 2010; Jacobs, 1961; Newman

and Kenworthy, 1996).

Relatively different patterns are observed between American and Australian, and European cities.

Many cities in Europe, such as Stockholm, managed tomaintain a transit, and non-motorized transport

oriented urban core. Car based suburbs and villages on the fringe are also a common European feature,

for example in many cities in the UK, Oslo and Frankfurt. On the other hand, Australian and North

American cities like Canberra and Phoenix have grown exclusively along with the rise of the

automobile. Their automobile based, low density suburbs became a normal living environment for

their citizens who largely had not been in contact with other styles of urban development. However,

suburbs that were beyond a distance of 50 km from the city centre became inevitably isolated from

traditional urban functions as the levels of traffic increased and the benefits of automobile decreased

(Newman and Kenworthy, 1996).

A departure from automobile oriented and modernist planning practices has been observed over the

past two decades. Smart growth and compact city development have gained wide policy interest in

North America, Europe and Australia. Valuable progress has been made in spatial planning aiming to