Improving Transport Project Appraisals
In the Islamic Countries
166
 Florio, M., Sartori, D., (2010), Getting Incentives Right: do we need ex post CBA ?, CSIL Working
paper N.01/2010.
 Flyvbjerg, B, Bruzelius, N. and Rothengatter, W. (2003), Megaprojects and risk: an anatomy of
ambition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
 Flyvbjerg, B. (2005). Policy and planning for large infrastructure projects: problems, causes,
cures. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, WPS3781, World Bank, Washington DC
 Flyvbjerg, B. (2007). How Optimism Bias and Strategic Misrepresentation in Early Project
Development Undermine Implementation. Concept Report No 17 Chapter 3, NTNU.
 Flyvbjerg, B., M.K. Skamris Holmand S.L. Buhl. (2002). “Underestimating cost in public works.
Error or Lie?” Journal of the American Planning Association , Vol. 68.
 Gómez-Lobo, A. (2012) “Institutional safeguards for Cost Benefit Analysis: Lessons from the
Chilean National Investment System”, Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis: Vol 3: Iss. 1, Article 1.
 Government of Jordan, 2014. Public Private Partnership Projects Regulations.
 Government of Jordan, 2014. Public-Private Partnership Law.
 Haezendonck, E. , ed. (2007). Transport Project Evaluation. Edgar Elgar, Chelthenam, UK.
 HEATCO, (2006). Developing Harmonised European Approaches for Transport Costing and
Project Assessment, Deliverable 5, Proposal for Harmonised Guidelines, IER, Germany
 Highways Agency (2001). Interim Advice Note Post Opening Project Evaluation. London:
Highways Agency.
 Highways Agency (2012). Post Opening Project Evaluation of Local Network Management
Schemes (POPE of LNMS): 9th Annual Evaluation Report. London: Highways Agency.
 HM Treasury (2003), The Green Book. Appraisal and evaluation in central government, HM
Treasury, London (UK).
 IBR, 2018. Environmental and Social Impact Assessments and Responsible Business in Iran.
 International Business Publications, 2016. Iran. Transportation Policy and Regulations
Handbook.
 Jamaleddin, K. and Kaysi, I., 2018. A Framework for Prioritizing Urban Arterial/Freeway
Interchange Types using Multi-Criteria Analysis, Transportation Research Record.
 Kaysi, I. et al., 2010. Prioritization of National Road Projects in Saudi Arabia: Framework and
Implementation, 12th World Conference on Transport Research, Lisbon.
 Kingdom of Saudi Arabia – Ministry of Transport, 2011. National Transportation Strategy.
 Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, 2016. Vision 2030.
 Kinninmont, J., 2017. Vision 2030 and Saudi Arabia’s Social Contract, Chatham House.
 Litman, T (2006). “What’s it worth? Economic Evaluation for Transportation Decision-
Making”, Victoria Transport Policy Institute.
 Little I.M.D. and Mirrlees J.A., 1974, Project appraisal and planning for developing countries,
London, Heinemann.
 Mackie P. and J. Nellthorp (2003, eds.), Transport projects, programmes and policies, Ashgate,
Aldershot (UK),
 Mackie, P. and J. Preston (1998). "Twenty-one sources of error and bias in transport project
appraisal." Transport Policy, 5, pp 1-7.
 Mackie, Peter; Nellthorp, John; Laird, James (2005). Notes on the Economic Evaluation of
Transport Projects: Fiscal Impacts. Transport Notes Series; No. TRN 8. World Bank,