Previous Page  166 / 214 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 166 / 214 Next Page
Page Background

Improving Transnational Transport Corridors

In the OIC Member Countries: Concepts and Cases

152

Trade between corridor economies is not high, like the EU, but at 16% of global trade,

it is moving in the right direction, but they have a long way to go exhibiting similar

levels of openness of around 0.3, except for Kenya 0.5 (like Turkey).

Border processing times have mostly halved since the introduction of more efficient

practices.

Yet transit times remain long, with commercial speeds of only 13 kph, which is not

faster than railways were 100 years ago. The reason for such slow operations remain

the excessive number of police checks and other stops.

Processing times at border posts have been cut dramatically following the introduction

of OSBS where processing time is 3 to 4 hours.

The corridor has managed to leverage high levels of investment to support its further

development, partly because of political consensus, partly because improving

performance and partly because good governance.

Despite the positive commentary, social development is still quite low as exhibited by

HDI of between 0.4 and 0.6 with high levels of unemployment in some countries.

4.6.11.

Recommendation

The main recommendation is to institute risk management

79

and green channeling at border

crossings for goods in transit to the Port. There is no reason to stop trucks that are in transit.

Transit fees to paid online and in advance. Improving road condition is also important.

4.7. International North-South Transport Corridor

This case study is built on a literature review including scientific journal articles and grey

literature, interviews with key persons and primary data collected during a field visit to the

INSTC Secretariat in Tehran on 31 July - 1 August 2017. Findings from the field visit are

emphasized rather than information from the open literature.

4.7.1.

General factors

INSTC is a multimodal transnational transportation corridor established in September 2000 in

Saint Petersburg by three founding members namely the Islamic Republic of Iran (hereafter

Iran), Republic of India (hereafter India), and Russian Federation (hereafter Russia). INSTC is a

result of tightening relationships between India and Iran, and between Iran and Russia. India

and Russia have a traditionally strong relationship. Within four years after its establishment,

the membership is increased to 13 countries. The continuous goal is to promote transportation

cooperation among the Member States.

This case study will focus on the multimodal corridor from India to Russia via Iran, which also

includes Azerbaijan, as indicated i

n Table 50.

79

Risk Management is a term used in Customs and Revenue Protection to assess the level of risk of particular transport entities;

this normally requires close cooperation between the customs organizations of each country and shared database.