Previous Page  169 / 214 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 169 / 214 Next Page
Page Background

Improving Transnational Transport Corridors

In the OIC Member Countries: Concepts and Cases

155

The Secretariat has a staff of approximately five persons; consist of experts in land transport,

railway, and legal issues. This size is quite small; as such the Secretariat does not have

sufficient capacity. This is due to the fact that that there is no membership fee to fund the work

of the Secretariat. As a result, the INSTC Secretariat is not yet developed like that of TRACECA

or CAREC. Currently, the role of the INSTC Secretariat is more defined as a “depository state”.

This situation is also reflected in the fact that the corridor developments are not incorporated

in the Transport Master Plans of the member countries (Soleimani, 2017). The Secretariat

plays a crucial role in promoting the importance of harmonizing the INSCT developments with

the transport policy and plans of the member countries.

4.7.3.

Economic factors

Table 52

presents the EoDB of the corridor countries. Azerbaijan performs best in terms of

border compliance, while Russia is very efficient in terms of documentary compliance. Low

efficiency is observed for Iran in both categories, most probably due to the economic sanctions.

In average, the total times taken and costs of exports in the corridor countries are very high.

The average times and costs for Europe and Central Asia (except for documentary compliance

costs) are at least 50% less.

Table 52: EoDB of corridor countries in 2016

Source: World Bank

.

The corridor countries are mainly maritime countries, which are generally more open than

landlocked countries. However, this is not the case in INSTC, as shown in

Table 53.

The

openness indices of the corridor countries are less than 50%, which shows that much of their

trade is internal most likely because they are large countries.

Table 53: Openness of corridor countries in 2016

Source: Fimotions (2017), analysis on data o

n www.trademap.org .

AZER

65

152

29

214

33

300

INDIA

130

143

106

413

38

92

IRAN

120

170

101

565

152

143

RUS

40

140

96

765

25

92

Country

Ranking

Border Compliance

Overall

Trading

across

borders

Time to

export

(hours)

Cost to

export

(USD)

Time to

export

(hours)

Cost to

export

(USD)

Documentary Compliance

Country

USD Millions

Openness

GDP

Imports

Exports

AZER

53,047

9,211

11,327

38.7%

IRAN

425,326

68,319 130,544

46.8%

INDIA

2,073,543 356,704 260,326

29.8%

RUS

1,326,015 182,257 285,491

35.3%