Previous Page  44 / 197 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 44 / 197 Next Page
Page Background

Destination Development and

Institutionalization Strategies

In the OIC Member Countries

34

Table 2: DMO Funding Sources

112

Amsterdam Marketing

Barcelona Consortium of Tourism

Granada DMO

South Tyrol DMOs

Public Funding

Membership Fees

Commercial Activities

Revenue

Public Funding

Membership Fees

Commercial Activities Revenue

Public Funding

Industry Support of Activities

Public Funding

Membership Fees

Source: DinarStandard

Funding for Amsterdam Marketing, in Holland, comes from the city of Amsterdam, membership fees and

commercial activities such sales revenue from books and maps at their visitors’ centers as well as the

Amsterdam City Card that gives tourists access to transportation and museums.

113

In Spain, the Barcelona Consortium of Tourism, which promotes and markets the city of Barcelona and

was founded in anticipation of the Olympic Games, gets public funding raised through hotel stay taxes in

addition to getting membership fees and revenue from product sales.

114

Funding for Tour Granada is provided through the Granada provincial government, however, some

activities are supported through contributions from the tourism industry, such as hotels providing

accommodation for familiarization tours groups, tour agencies providing guides, and food and beverage

outlets providing meals.

115

In Italy, the South Tyrol government had to reverse its “voluntary” approach for funding DMOs through

membership fees and institute a lodging tax paid by tourists to fund the activities of destination

management organizations since membership in the local tourism organizations is not mandatory thus

was not sufficient to ensure sustainable funding of DMOs in the region.

116

A recent study by Destination Marketing Association International (DMAI), the “2015 DMO Organizational

and Financial Profile Study” which consisted of a survey of 246 DMOs from the United States, Canada and

Bermuda, indicated that almost 90%of funding of small (less than $1M) andmedium sized ($1-5M) budget

DMOs came frompublic sources. The main source of public funding was hotel room taxes, which accounted

for 73% of total public investments made available to DMOs, with more than 87%of DMOs receiving funds

from it. 14% of DMOs also mentioned receiving public funds from district tourism improvement and

voluntary assessments. Other sources of public funding include restaurant taxes, state, city and province

funding. With respect to private sources of funding, 39% of all DMOs mentioned getting revenues from

paying members, with 60% of the larger (more than $5M) budget DMOs citing getting revenues from

memberships. On average, advertising revenues represented almost 25% of all private revenue of the

surveyed DMOs, while membership revenues consisted 16% and partnership revenues 12%. Other

sources of private funding mentioned by surveyed DMOs included corporate sponsorships, event hosting,

publication sales and service fees.

117

It is important to note that the legal form of DMOs can affect the funding sources available to them, with

governmental DMOs mainly depending on public funding raised through hotel taxes and user fees, while

112

For more information on the mentioned DMOs, please refer to the case studies chapter.

113

Interview with team member of Amsterdam Marketing.

114

Interview with team member of Barcelona Activa.

Interview with team member of Tourism Planning and Development, Patronato Provincial de Toursimo de Granada.

116

Please refer to Italy’s case study for more information about DMOs in South Tyrol.

117

Destination Marketing Association International (2015).

DMO Organizational and Financial Profile Study.

1-40