Previous Page  112 / 180 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 112 / 180 Next Page
Page Background

Risk & Crisis Management in Tourism Sector:

Recovery from Crisis

in the OIC Member Countries

102

The Department of Tourism follows the National Tourism Sector Strategy (2011-20) and the

Tourism Strategic Plan (2015-20) to help it meet its objectives.

Around 450 tourism businesses levy a 1% charge on services to their guests and clients to

support South African Tourism’s overseas promotional efforts. This is known as the TOMSA levy

(i.e. ‘TourismMarketing South Africa’) and is channelled to SAT via the TBCSA (Ramawela, pers.

comm., 11 May 2017). This however forms only 6% of SAT’s budget: the remainder is covered

by central government funding.

5.1.2.

Crises Affecting the South African Tourism Industry

According to a 2017 report, South Africa is still judged to have significant untapped potential in

terms of development in its tourism industry, but according to a Mintel (2017) report, its

potential is threatened by a number of weaknesses. The principal ongoing challenges can all be

classified as manmade crises rather than natural disasters: indeed David Frost, the head of

SATSA, remarked that South Africa’s tourism industry pain is self-inflicted (Frost, 2017, cited in

Alfred et al, 2017). The main issues are as follows:

The introduction in 2014 of stringent new visa requirements for visitors from China,

India, Nigeria and other countries. Individuals from these markets are now required to

apply in person for their entry visa rather than a travel agent being able to do so on their

behalf. The introduction of the new rules saw a sharp drop in arrivals from China (down

38% in the first quarter of 2015), India (down 13%) and Nigeria (down 15%) in

2014/15 (England, 2015; Oxford Business Group, 2015). The regulations have since

been relaxed after pressure from the Department of Tourism and the private sector and

there has been some recovery in these markets, but overall the action was indicative of

poor coordination between different government departments and with the private

sector.

A failure to understand and prepare for the characteristics of specific markets. For

instance, 65% of the Indian market visits South Africa during the southern hemisphere

winter in order to escape the hot season at home. Yet according to one tour operator

the SA consulate in Mumbai and High Commission in Delhi are never prepared for the

annual upsurge in visa applications in high season – we warn them about it every year

and they keep doing it” (Groenewald, 2017, cited in Alfred et al, 2017).

New visa requirements were introduced for visitors from New Zealand in 2017 in an

apparent ‘tit for tat’ retaliation because New Zealand had strengthened visa

requirements for visitors from South Africa. This led to the cancellation of several group

tours (Emmanuel, 2017).

In addition, in 2015 it became a requirement for all children (under the age of 18)

entering or leaving South Africa to have the written consent of both parents and to be in

possession of an unabridged, original birth certificate at the point of entry – with a

notarised translation into English if the original was in another language. An attempt to

restrict child trafficking, this regulation was introduced without sufficient lead-time or

consultation and caused considerable disruption to families’ travel plans and negative