Previous Page  126 / 252 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 126 / 252 Next Page
Page Background

Improving Customs Transit Systems

In the Islamic Countries

112

Other border controls supported by a risk management

system

48.90%

48.90%

2.20%

Possibility to provide additional trade facilitation measures to

operators meeting specified criteria (authorized operators)

48.90%

31.10%

20.00%

Transparency of the criteria for qualifying as an Authorized

Operator and the procedures for submission and review of

applications for AO status

66.70%

20.00%

13.30%

Adjustment of working hours of Customs personnel to

commercial needs

11.10%

22.20%

66.70%

Source: WTO TFA indicators database

3.2.5.7

Border Agency Cooperation at National Level

In only 6.6% of the countries there is an explicit co-ordination strategy led at a high political

level, while in 86.7% of the countries co-operation, co-ordination, exchange of information and

mutual assistance involve substantially all domestic agencies involved in the management of

cross border trade. Only 15.6% of the countries have institutionalized regional meetings to

develop a strategy and oversee implementation of border agency co-operation, and the

proceedings are publicly available, while 51.1% even have regular meetings, the information is

not available publicly. Still, there are 33.3% of the countries don’t have meetings between the

different public agencies involved, or such meetings are only ad hoc basis. In more than a half

OIC MS, data requirements of various border agencies are not coordinated /harmonized, and in

only 2.2% of the countries data requirements are coordinated/harmonized, and single data

entry is possible for traders. Also, only 2.2% of the MS are interconnected or have shared

computer systems where data is available in real-time. In 80% of the MS, there are no

interconnected or shared computer systems and no exchange of data on the national level

(among agencies involved in the management of cross border trade). In 86.7% of the OIC MS,

there is informal and ad hoc co-ordination to address contingencies, but in only 6.7% of the

countries there is a single location and coordinated timing is established for the physical

inspection of consignments by the various concerned agencies. Likewise, 91.1% of countries do

not share the inspection results with the agencies involved in the management of cross border

trade. When it comes to cooperation regarding risk management, in 68.9% of countries national

agencies involved in the management of cross border trade maintain separate risk management

mechanisms, while in only 4.4% there is interagency synergies in terms of risk analysis and

shared data and risk profiling of goods. In almost half of the countries, each agency certifies its

own AEOs and does not share infrastructure and equipment.