Enhancing Public Availability of Customs Information
In the Islamic Countries
3
Against this background, the report makes the following recommendations for the consideration
of OIC member countries:
1.
Generalized Commitment to Transparency
: It is difficult to move forward on the
public availability of Customs and trade-related information in an environment where
other government processes are only minimally transparent. Rather, successful
examples show that reducing informational trade costs typically goes hand in hand with
a broader commitment to transparent, participative governance. The form this takes
will of course vary from country to country, but the greater a government’s proven
commitment to transparency, the more likely it is that the whole trade community will
become positively involved in the process of managing public information availability.
2.
Ensuring Close Cooperation of Key National Partners
: Improving public information
availability requires that a range of border agencies, as well as other regulatory bodies
and public sector organizations, exchange information freely and cooperate towards a
common end. Ensuring such cooperation is often not easy, but can be justified by
reference to the trade benefits that are likely to result.
3.
Involvement of the Trade Community
: The trade community consists of a wide range
of stakeholders, from producers and consumers, to shippers, freight forwarders, and
even financial institutions involved in trade finance, as well as Customs and other
border agencies. An important first step is creating a forum in which the whole
community can exchange views, and identify priority areas for action. An NTFC can
perform this role, but the nature and composition of that body will necessarily vary from
one country to another. In general, it is better to cast the net wide to ensure that all
stakeholders can feel a sense of ownership of reforms.
4.
Use of Information Technology
: Low and middle income countries have the
opportunity to “leapfrog” the traditional Single Window framework by opting for a
virtual Single Window. From an informational point of view, this approach results in an
online portal where all rules and regulations can easily be accessed, forms can be
downloaded and filled in, and necessary paperwork can be filed electronically, as well
as fees paid. Some level of digital infrastructure is required before such a system can
become reality, both in terms of user access to ICTs, but also the necessary legal
framework covering use of electronic documents and digital signatures. Nonetheless,
technical assistance from international organizations, as well as a considerable body of
knowledge that can be used in South-South experience sharing, suggests that this
approach may be within the reach of a considerable number of countries.
5.
Ambition in TFA Notifications
: Improving trade facilitation, including through
enhancing the public availability of Customs and trade-related information, is part of a
newly competitive environment for attracting trade and investment. Joining Global
Value Chains (GVCs) and leveraging them for development outcomes requires that trade
costs be as low as possible. As such, OIC member countries should be ambitious in
notifying their TFA obligations. Concretely, that means they should put as much as
possible of the agreement in Category A. Category B notifications should preferably
involve relatively short time limits for implementation. Category C notifications should
be used sparingly, and should identify with precision the technical assistance and
capacity building that are required. Of course, for those countries that are not members
of the WTO, they are not legally subject to the TFA’s requirements. But it is nonetheless
part of their trading environment, as neighbors and other partner countries will soon
upgrade progress. The TFA therefore still provides a useful benchmark, in tandem with
other relevant instruments, for countries that are not WTO members.