Previous Page  15 / 194 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 15 / 194 Next Page
Page Background

Reducing Postharvest Losses

In the OIC Member Countries

1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This analysis of postharvest losses in the OIC Member Countries was conducted by a team from

the Natural Resources Institute (NRI), University of Greenwich between January and July 2016.

The report aims to provide analysis that can contribute to reduce postharvest losses in OIC

Member Countries. It does this through review of the current situation, identification of

approaches and practices, and policy recommendation for future investments.

The analysis is on postharvest losses, defined by COMCEC as food damage or degradation of

food during different stages of the food supply chain. We interpret this as those losses that are

incurred between the farm-gate and prior to retail and consumption.

The method used was a combination of brief literature review, an on-line survey of key

informants in OIC Member Countries, and a series of commodity specific case studies that

included three field visits.

The scope of the study included all OIC Member Countries, all three official Regional Groups of

OIC Member Countries (African, Asian and Arab), and commodity representation from seven

commodity groups. Field visits were conducted in Indonesia, Bangladesh and Oman.

In Chapter 1 a conceptual framework is developed from our knowledge of the literature and

the challenges and complexities of measuring postharvest losses considered.

Chapter 2 summarises the literature available on the commodities under study and the 57 OIC

Member Countries. The commonly cited overall postharvest loss figure (which includes on-

farm and consumer levels not considered here) is 32% (FAO), with higher assessment for

perishables such as fruit & vegetables (40-50%), and lower losses for durables (e.g. 20-30%

for cereals). This section highlights the wide range literature and its depth of analysis. Some

commodities and countries are well covered (e.g. maize in Sub-Saharan Africa), but most are

poorly analysed in existing research, with some serious knowledge gaps identified (e.g., some

countries with little or no literature, other commodities under researched).

The results of the on-line survey and the case studies are discussed in Chapters 3 and 4 and the

causes and consequences of postharvest losses emerging from the analysis reviewed in

Chapter 5. The summary of global physical and economic losses vs OIC Member Country losses

are summarised in the tables below.

Summary of physical losses for commodity groups in the world and OIC Member Countries

Postharvest loss

Global

Literature

review

Online

survey

Case/Field study

Cereals

12-15%

9-31%

10-25%

16-48%

Root and Tuber

crops

22-34%

7-50%

12-40%

7-25%

Oilseeds and Pulses

10-18%

no data

no data

14%

Fruit

and

Vegetables

15-38%

10-60%

5-65%

3-40%

Meat

and

Meat

products

11-12%

6%

no data

25-40%

Milk

and

Dairy

products

2-19%

2-27%

30%

6-21%

Fish and

16-25%

no data

50%

3-50%

Source: Authors own analysis.