Previous Page  140 / 169 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 140 / 169 Next Page
Page Background

Increasing the Resilience of the Food Systems

In Islamic States in Face of Future Food Crises

129

5.2.

Survey Feedback

Respondents were asked to rate the role played by a number of support factors in enabling

agricultural production (including all categories, spanning grains, crops, meat, dairy, sugars) in

their countries. A five-point scale was used, including very positive, positive, neutral, negative,

and very negative. As the following chart illustrates the availability of arable land hadthe highest

positive rating (70%), followed by access to water (57%), availability of qualified labor (54%),

affordable access to fertilizers (51%), and affordable access to inputs including seed and

machinery (49%). Almost half of the respondents (49%) assigned a negative rating the existence

of the price stabilizationmechanisms, whichwas followed by availability of financing and access

to technology with a negative rating of 43% and 40% respectively.

Figure 32: Survey Findings - Rating of Factors Enabling Agricultural Production

Respondents were also asked in a related question on the ease with which farmers and

agricultural businesses in their countries are able to generate a reliable, sustainable living that

can support their families’ needs through growing a diversity of crops. A half of the respondents

(51%) believed that this is difficult for farmers, and only a third of the respondents (32%) cited

that it was an easy task while the remaining respondents were neutral.

Respondentswere asked torate the role played by a number of post-harvest factors in ensuring

that agricultural production is financially viable. A five-point scale was used, including very

positive, positive, neutral, negative, and very negative. As the following chart illustrates the

availability of sizable domestic end market had the highest positive rating (62%), followed by a

developed agro-industry (51%), good effective grain storage facilities and access to export

markets (50% each), and cost-effective and efficient transportation and logistics (48%).